Evaluation of root canal morphology of premolar teeth using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the root and canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to assess bilateral anatomical symmetry between contralateral teeth. A total of 157 CBCT scans from patients aged 18–60 years were retrospectively analyzed. Root number, canal number, Vertucci classification types, and bilateral symmetry of premolars in the maxilla and mandible were recorded. Maxillary first premolars most commonly exhibited two roots and two canals (70.70%), with Vertucci Type IV being the dominant configuration (78.02%). Maxillary second premolars most frequently presented one root with two canals (48.40%), and Vertucci Type I was the most prevalent morphology (28.66%). Mandibular first and second premolars predominantly exhibited one root and one canal (72.29% and 93.63%), with Vertucci Type I being the most frequent configuration (71.65% and 93.63%). Bilateral root and canal symmetry was high for all premolars: 89.15% in maxillary first premolars, 89.78% in maxillary second premolars, 87.26% in mandibular first premolars, and 94.90% in mandibular second premolars. Root and canal morphology differed by sex and by jaw (p < 0.001). CBCT enables accurate visualization of premolar root canal anatomy and assists clinicians in identifying anatomical variations. The high degree of bilateral symmetry suggests that contralateral teeth may serve as useful anatomical references during endodontic procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07929-z
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of root canal morphology of premolar teeth using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study

Berceste Polat Akmansoy, Tuğba Cebeci
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Evaluation of root canal morphology of premolar teeth using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study

Berceste Polat Akmansoy, Tuğba Cebeci
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the root and canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to assess bilateral anatomical symmetry between contralateral teeth. A total of 157 CBCT scans from patients aged 18–60 years were retrospectively analyzed. Root number, canal number, Vertucci classification types, and bilateral symmetry of premolars in the maxilla and mandible were recorded. Maxillary first premolars most commonly exhibited two roots and two canals (70.70%), with Vertucci Type IV being the dominant configuration (78.02%). Maxillary second premolars most frequently presented one root with two canals (48.40%), and Vertucci Type I was the most prevalent morphology (28.66%). Mandibular first and second premolars predominantly exhibited one root and one canal (72.29% and 93.63%), with Vertucci Type I being the most frequent configuration (71.65% and 93.63%). Bilateral root and canal symmetry was high for all premolars: 89.15% in maxillary first premolars, 89.78% in maxillary second premolars, 87.26% in mandibular first premolars, and 94.90% in mandibular second premolars. Root and canal morphology differed by sex and by jaw (p < 0.001). CBCT enables accurate visualization of premolar root canal anatomy and assists clinicians in identifying anatomical variations. The high degree of bilateral symmetry suggests that contralateral teeth may serve as useful anatomical references during endodontic procedures.

BMC Oral Health
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR), Maltepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.