Wind-Induced Pressure Distribution of Nonrectangular Shaped Low-Rise Buildings

Extreme wind events are responsible for significant human and economic losses, with low-rise buildings particularly affected during such events. The current wind load provisions are based on wind tunnel tests of rectangular building models conducted over the past four decades. However, modern buildings have evolved into complex plan shapes that are often hardly represented by simplified shapes in existing provisions. This study investigated the pressure distribution around buildings with nonrectangular plans. Seven models were constructed and tested in a large wind tunnel under simulated atmospheric boundary-layer conditions. The results indicate that the wall and roof pressure distributions can vary significantly from those of rectangular buildings. Owing to the increased number and complexity of corners, more separation zones are formed, leading to a higher likelihood of multiple simultaneous suction zones. A comparison with current wind provisions also revealed that, in several cases, the local and area-averaged pressures exceeded the recommended design guidelines. Further research is essential to develop a wind load database that encompasses a wider variety of building shapes and ultimately establishes nonrectangular building wind design guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-14906
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind-Induced Pressure Distribution of Nonrectangular Shaped Low-Rise Buildings

Manuel Matus, Ioannis Zisis
Journal of Structural Engineering
Wind and Air Flow Studies
article

Wind-Induced Pressure Distribution of Nonrectangular Shaped Low-Rise Buildings

Manuel Matus, Ioannis Zisis
article en

Abstract

Extreme wind events are responsible for significant human and economic losses, with low-rise buildings particularly affected during such events. The current wind load provisions are based on wind tunnel tests of rectangular building models conducted over the past four decades. However, modern buildings have evolved into complex plan shapes that are often hardly represented by simplified shapes in existing provisions. This study investigated the pressure distribution around buildings with nonrectangular plans. Seven models were constructed and tested in a large wind tunnel under simulated atmospheric boundary-layer conditions. The results indicate that the wall and roof pressure distributions can vary significantly from those of rectangular buildings. Owing to the increased number and complexity of corners, more separation zones are formed, leading to a higher likelihood of multiple simultaneous suction zones. A comparison with current wind provisions also revealed that, in several cases, the local and area-averaged pressures exceeded the recommended design guidelines. Further research is essential to develop a wind load database that encompasses a wider variety of building shapes and ultimately establishes nonrectangular building wind design guidelines.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 152(5)
Florida International University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.