Interpreting Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients with Obesity: Clinical Impact of Weight Adjustment

<b>Background:</b> Accurately estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) in critically ill obese patients remains a significant clinical challenge, as predictive equations are consistently inadequate. Metabolic heterogeneity across obesity classes and the role of substrate utilization are insufficiently characterized. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the impact of different weight-normalization methods on the interpretation of REE and to identify independent metabolic determinants of weight-adjusted energy expenditure in critically ill patients with obesity. <b>Methods:</b> Bicentric cross-sectional study of 148 critically ill adults with obesity undergoing indirect calorimetry. REE normalized by actual body weight (REE/kg), ideal body weight (REE/IBW), and adjusted body weight (REE/AdjBW) was calculated. Multivariable models with robust standard errors (HC3), stratified analyses by obesity class (I-III) with a Chow test, and internal validation were performed using 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations). <b>Results:</b> Absolute REE did not differ significantly between BMI categories (<i>p</i> = 0.679), while REE/kg progressively decreased from normal weight (27.8 kcal/kg/day) to class III obesity (16.9 kcal/kg/day; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The respiratory quotient (RQ) emerged as the most robust independent correlate of adjusted REE (β = -13 to -15 kcal·kg<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas clinical severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II) and comorbidity (Charlson) did not show significant associations. Stratified analyses revealed significant structural heterogeneity between obesity classes (F = 4.545, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), with no significant predictors identified in class III obesity, likely reflecting limited statistical power in this subgroup. <b>Conclusions:</b> Normalizing REE using different weight indices fundamentally alters its metabolic interpretation. RQ surpasses traditional clinical scores as a correlate of adjusted REE, consistent with a phenotype of metabolic inflexibility. The heterogeneity between obesity classes underscores the need for individualized indirect calorimetry rather than reliance on predictive equations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051677
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients with Obesity: Clinical Impact of Weight Adjustment

Jaen Carlos Cagua-Ordoñez, Jesica Asparch, Martha Montalván, Claudia Kecskes et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Interpreting Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients with Obesity: Clinical Impact of Weight Adjustment

Jaen Carlos Cagua-Ordoñez, Jesica Asparch, Martha Montalván, Claudia Kecskes, María Jimena Reberendo, Ludwig Alvarez-Cordova, Mariana Rella, Juan Marcos Parise-Vasco, Facundo Javier Gutierrez, Daniel Tettamanti Miranda, Mario Omar Pozo, Sebastián Chapela, María Victoria Peroni, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Natalia Llobera
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Accurately estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) in critically ill obese patients remains a significant clinical challenge, as predictive equations are consistently inadequate. Metabolic heterogeneity across obesity classes and the role of substrate utilization are insufficiently characterized. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the impact of different weight-normalization methods on the interpretation of REE and to identify independent metabolic determinants of weight-adjusted energy expenditure in critically ill patients with obesity. <b>Methods:</b> Bicentric cross-sectional study of 148 critically ill adults with obesity undergoing indirect calorimetry. REE normalized by actual body weight (REE/kg), ideal body weight (REE/IBW), and adjusted body weight (REE/AdjBW) was calculated. Multivariable models with robust standard errors (HC3), stratified analyses by obesity class (I-III) with a Chow test, and internal validation were performed using 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations). <b>Results:</b> Absolute REE did not differ significantly between BMI categories (<i>p</i> = 0.679), while REE/kg progressively decreased from normal weight (27.8 kcal/kg/day) to class III obesity (16.9 kcal/kg/day; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The respiratory quotient (RQ) emerged as the most robust independent correlate of adjusted REE (β = -13 to -15 kcal·kg<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas clinical severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II) and comorbidity (Charlson) did not show significant associations. Stratified analyses revealed significant structural heterogeneity between obesity classes (F = 4.545, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), with no significant predictors identified in class III obesity, likely reflecting limited statistical power in this subgroup. <b>Conclusions:</b> Normalizing REE using different weight indices fundamentally alters its metabolic interpretation. RQ surpasses traditional clinical scores as a correlate of adjusted REE, consistent with a phenotype of metabolic inflexibility. The heterogeneity between obesity classes underscores the need for individualized indirect calorimetry rather than reliance on predictive equations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(5)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil (EC), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (EC), Universidad de Las Américas (EC), Universidad Indoamérica (EC), Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.