A practical framework to approach the development and evaluation of patient registries for rare diseases

Patient registries are essential to rare disease research, but the implementation and maintenance of a registry requires substantial investments. Despite the large number of rare disease communities that currently have, or are planning for, a registry, there is little guidance on if and when a rare disease registry should be established. There is also little guidance on how to articulate registry objectives to address current and evolving scientific and community needs. A practical framework is needed to assist rare disease registry stakeholders to understand and prioritize registry objectives and requirements for registry design, data collection, and funding. In this review, we synthesize existing patient registry classifications and prior reports of rare disease registry experience into a unified framework characterizing rare disease registries by their types of research questions and scientific needs. This simple framework can be used to help rare disease communities identify their research requirements, and support decision making around whether to initiate, and how invest in, registry infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04270-0
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A practical framework to approach the development and evaluation of patient registries for rare diseases

Rachel Richesson, Maya Vaishnaw
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

A practical framework to approach the development and evaluation of patient registries for rare diseases

Rachel Richesson, Maya Vaishnaw
article en

Abstract

Patient registries are essential to rare disease research, but the implementation and maintenance of a registry requires substantial investments. Despite the large number of rare disease communities that currently have, or are planning for, a registry, there is little guidance on if and when a rare disease registry should be established. There is also little guidance on how to articulate registry objectives to address current and evolving scientific and community needs. A practical framework is needed to assist rare disease registry stakeholders to understand and prioritize registry objectives and requirements for registry design, data collection, and funding. In this review, we synthesize existing patient registry classifications and prior reports of rare disease registry experience into a unified framework characterizing rare disease registries by their types of research questions and scientific needs. This simple framework can be used to help rare disease communities identify their research requirements, and support decision making around whether to initiate, and how invest in, registry infrastructure.

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Michigan (US), Cleveland Foundation (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.