Rehberlik ve Araştırma Merkezlerinde Eğitsel Değerlendirme Sürecinde Okuma ve Yazma Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Introduction: This study examined the current practices, challenges, and personnel needs related to the assessment of reading and writing skills in Guidance and Research Centers (GRC) in Türkiye.Method: The research utilized a phenomenological design, which is a qualitative research approach. The study included 17 participants with various professional backgrounds, working in two Guidance and Research Centers in Ankara. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis.Findings: The analysis identified five primary themes in participants’ perspectives: (1) challenges in assessing reading and writing; (2) ease of assessment processes; (3) materials and measurement tools employed; (4) expectations from institutions; and (5) training requirements. Participants highlighted several impediments to the process, including material shortages, non-standardized assessment tools, and inadequate professional training. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that tools such as performance assessment forms facilitated these processes. Moreover, it was noted that organizing training programs to enhance professional development, creating adaptable materials, and leveraging technology more effectively in GRC processes are crucial.Discussion: This study enhances understanding of how reading and writing skills are assessed in GRCs and offers recommendations for improving current practices. The findings can guide educational policies and solutions for GRCs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1651955
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rehberlik ve Araştırma Merkezlerinde Eğitsel Değerlendirme Sürecinde Okuma ve Yazma Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Özgül Güler Bülbül
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Educational Methods and Analysis
article

Rehberlik ve Araştırma Merkezlerinde Eğitsel Değerlendirme Sürecinde Okuma ve Yazma Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Özgül Güler Bülbül
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the current practices, challenges, and personnel needs related to the assessment of reading and writing skills in Guidance and Research Centers (GRC) in Türkiye.Method: The research utilized a phenomenological design, which is a qualitative research approach. The study included 17 participants with various professional backgrounds, working in two Guidance and Research Centers in Ankara. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis.Findings: The analysis identified five primary themes in participants’ perspectives: (1) challenges in assessing reading and writing; (2) ease of assessment processes; (3) materials and measurement tools employed; (4) expectations from institutions; and (5) training requirements. Participants highlighted several impediments to the process, including material shortages, non-standardized assessment tools, and inadequate professional training. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that tools such as performance assessment forms facilitated these processes. Moreover, it was noted that organizing training programs to enhance professional development, creating adaptable materials, and leveraging technology more effectively in GRC processes are crucial.Discussion: This study enhances understanding of how reading and writing skills are assessed in GRCs and offers recommendations for improving current practices. The findings can guide educational policies and solutions for GRCs.

DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Educational Methods and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.