Governing chemical recycling for the circular economy in Asia: Legal clarity, economic governance, and Global South implications

Chemical recycling is increasingly promoted across Asia as a pathway to circular-economy transitions, yet its economic performance varies widely despite similar technological adoption. This article argues that these divergences arise less from technology or finance than from failures of legal clarity that disrupt coordination in circular-economy governance. Positioning Asia as a theory-generating region, the study conceptualizes legal clarity as an economic signal within economic governance shaping investment incentives, material flows, and distributional outcomes. Using Bangladesh as a focal case, the analysis combines comparative evidence from Asia with regulatory benchmarks from the European Union, Japan, and the United States to show how definitional ambiguity enables greenwashing, carbon lock-in, and the exclusion of informal actors. The article introduces the Legal Clarity Framework (LCF) as a diagnostic tool and demonstrates that coherent legal design is essential for credible circular-economy transitions and transferable governance insights for the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia and the Global Economy
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2026.100135
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing chemical recycling for the circular economy in Asia: Legal clarity, economic governance, and Global South implications

Yunus Ahmed, Md. Faridul Islam, Md. Mohiuddin, Kazi Mahomuda Happy et al.
Asia and the Global Economy
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Governing chemical recycling for the circular economy in Asia: Legal clarity, economic governance, and Global South implications

Yunus Ahmed, Md. Faridul Islam, Md. Mohiuddin, Kazi Mahomuda Happy, Tasnim Binte Shohid, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Md. Riaduzzaman
article en

Abstract

Chemical recycling is increasingly promoted across Asia as a pathway to circular-economy transitions, yet its economic performance varies widely despite similar technological adoption. This article argues that these divergences arise less from technology or finance than from failures of legal clarity that disrupt coordination in circular-economy governance. Positioning Asia as a theory-generating region, the study conceptualizes legal clarity as an economic signal within economic governance shaping investment incentives, material flows, and distributional outcomes. Using Bangladesh as a focal case, the analysis combines comparative evidence from Asia with regulatory benchmarks from the European Union, Japan, and the United States to show how definitional ambiguity enables greenwashing, carbon lock-in, and the exclusion of informal actors. The article introduces the Legal Clarity Framework (LCF) as a diagnostic tool and demonstrates that coherent legal design is essential for credible circular-economy transitions and transferable governance insights for the Global South.

Asia and the Global EconomyVol. 6(1)
Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD), Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BD), Daffodil International University (BD), University of Science and Technology Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.