Vasopressin and angiotensin II pathways differentially modulate human fear response dynamics to looming threats

While basal threat processing dynamics (e.g., visual looming) are well characterized in animals, the underlying mechanisms and their modulation by neuropeptide systems with different modulatory roles in threat processing (vasopressin, angiotensin II) remain poorly understood in humans. In a randomized, placebo-controlled eye-tracking study (N = 111), we administered vasopressin (AVP) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (via Losartan, LT) during a time-to-collision threat paradigm. This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06329076, NCT06329063) on April 11, 2024, prior to participant enrollment. Behaviorally, AVP induced a systematic time overestimation while LT induced temporal compression and reduced state anxiety. Pupillometry revealed distinguishable profiles: AVP induced sustained constriction during stimulus approach followed by post-stimulus threat-specific dilation, LT maintained sustained pupillary constriction throughout both approach and occlusion phases yet preserving threat-specificity, while placebo (PLC) showed no threat-specific modulation. A computational framework (combining Functional Principal Component Analysis, clustering, and Markov chain analysis) underscored the distinct modulations: AVP stabilized a high-arousal state characterized by the co-activation of vigilance, threat-proactive preparation and a shift from perception to internal simulation. LT suppressed transitions to high-arousal states and exhibited maximal sequence entropy, reflecting flexible response patterns-contrasting with placebo's lowest entropy dynamics. These results demonstrate that AVP and LT differentially regulate basal threat processing via separable neuropeptide pathways: AVP sustains hypervigilance while LT promotes anxiolysis and adaptive flexibility. Our findings suggest neuropeptide pathway-specific targets maladaptive threat processing in trauma- or anxiety-related disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003668
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vasopressin and angiotensin II pathways differentially modulate human fear response dynamics to looming threats

Meng Han, Yueyuan Zheng, wenyi dong, Kun Fu et al.
PLoS Biology
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
article

Vasopressin and angiotensin II pathways differentially modulate human fear response dynamics to looming threats

Meng Han, Yueyuan Zheng, wenyi dong, Kun Fu, Junjie Wang, Benjamin Becker, Yuanhang Xu, Ting Xu, Dezhong Yao, Keith Kendrick
article en

Abstract

While basal threat processing dynamics (e.g., visual looming) are well characterized in animals, the underlying mechanisms and their modulation by neuropeptide systems with different modulatory roles in threat processing (vasopressin, angiotensin II) remain poorly understood in humans. In a randomized, placebo-controlled eye-tracking study (N = 111), we administered vasopressin (AVP) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (via Losartan, LT) during a time-to-collision threat paradigm. This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06329076, NCT06329063) on April 11, 2024, prior to participant enrollment. Behaviorally, AVP induced a systematic time overestimation while LT induced temporal compression and reduced state anxiety. Pupillometry revealed distinguishable profiles: AVP induced sustained constriction during stimulus approach followed by post-stimulus threat-specific dilation, LT maintained sustained pupillary constriction throughout both approach and occlusion phases yet preserving threat-specificity, while placebo (PLC) showed no threat-specific modulation. A computational framework (combining Functional Principal Component Analysis, clustering, and Markov chain analysis) underscored the distinct modulations: AVP stabilized a high-arousal state characterized by the co-activation of vigilance, threat-proactive preparation and a shift from perception to internal simulation. LT suppressed transitions to high-arousal states and exhibited maximal sequence entropy, reflecting flexible response patterns-contrasting with placebo's lowest entropy dynamics. These results demonstrate that AVP and LT differentially regulate basal threat processing via separable neuropeptide pathways: AVP sustains hypervigilance while LT promotes anxiolysis and adaptive flexibility. Our findings suggest neuropeptide pathway-specific targets maladaptive threat processing in trauma- or anxiety-related disorders.

PLoS BiologyVol. 24(2)
Southwest University (CN), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.