The closing discussion of the Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating meeting (June 2023, Copenhagen): a review

International Conferences on Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating are held every three years, most recently in Copenhagen in 2023. Here we review the closing discussion of this meeting and discuss subjects of current debate: issues related to aliquot size in luminescence dating; statistical models for age calculation when working on well-bleached samples; the importance and limitations of dose recovery tests; estimation of water content averaged over sediment history; age calculation methods and software, and the need for intercomparisons; and, finally, errors and uncertainties in luminescence dating. For each topic, we review the existing literature, summarise the state-of-the-art and provide recommendations based on our views and interpretation as our contribution to the debate. We suggest that: aliquot selection should be systematically questioned rather than routinely applied; the Central Age Model leads to sample dependent but systematic age underestimation; light recovery tests are preferred to dose recovery tests (although the two are equivalent at lower doses); there is considerable room for improvement in our methods for lifetime water content estimation; and a careful, thorough treatment of errors and uncertainties (especially in dose rate) is required for reliable chronological modelling of luminescence ages. The LED2023 meeting held in Copenhagen ended with a discussion of currently non-consensual issues in OSL dating. We list the discussed questions and review the six following items based on existing literature: issues related to aliquot size in luminescence dating; statistical models for age calculation when working on well-bleached samples; the importance and limitations of dose recovery tests; estimation of water content averaged over sediment history; age calculation methods and software, and the need for intercomparisons; and, finally, errors and uncertainties in luminescence dating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Measurements
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2026.107655
Primary Topic
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The closing discussion of the Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating meeting (June 2023, Copenhagen): a review

Sumiko Tsukamoto, Guillaume Guérin, Jintang Qin, Jakob Wallinga et al.
Radiation Measurements
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
article

The closing discussion of the Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating meeting (June 2023, Copenhagen): a review

Sumiko Tsukamoto, Guillaume Guérin, Jintang Qin, Jakob Wallinga, Andrew Murray
article en

Abstract

International Conferences on Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating are held every three years, most recently in Copenhagen in 2023. Here we review the closing discussion of this meeting and discuss subjects of current debate: issues related to aliquot size in luminescence dating; statistical models for age calculation when working on well-bleached samples; the importance and limitations of dose recovery tests; estimation of water content averaged over sediment history; age calculation methods and software, and the need for intercomparisons; and, finally, errors and uncertainties in luminescence dating. For each topic, we review the existing literature, summarise the state-of-the-art and provide recommendations based on our views and interpretation as our contribution to the debate. We suggest that: aliquot selection should be systematically questioned rather than routinely applied; the Central Age Model leads to sample dependent but systematic age underestimation; light recovery tests are preferred to dose recovery tests (although the two are equivalent at lower doses); there is considerable room for improvement in our methods for lifetime water content estimation; and a careful, thorough treatment of errors and uncertainties (especially in dose rate) is required for reliable chronological modelling of luminescence ages. The LED2023 meeting held in Copenhagen ended with a discussion of currently non-consensual issues in OSL dating. We list the discussed questions and review the six following items based on existing literature: issues related to aliquot size in luminescence dating; statistical models for age calculation when working on well-bleached samples; the importance and limitations of dose recovery tests; estimation of water content averaged over sediment history; age calculation methods and software, and the need for intercomparisons; and, finally, errors and uncertainties in luminescence dating.

Radiation MeasurementsVol. 193
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Géosciences Rennes (FR), Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating (DK), LIAG Institute for Applied Geophysics (DE), Université de Rennes (FR), University of Tübingen (DE), China Earthquake Administration (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Electron Spin Resonance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.