Beyond the incision: a retrospective comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive myomectomy outcomes in terms of fertility

Fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the female genital tract and are often linked to various clinical issues, including potential impairment of fertility. Surgical removal of fibroids can be performed via laparotomy, laparoscopy, or hysteroscopy. However, myomectomy can result in serious consequences. Thus, it is crucial to evaluate whether the surgery enhances fertility and, if so, to identify the most effective surgical approach. This retrospective study compared the fertility outcomes between minimally invasive myomectomy (laparoscopic and hysteroscopic) and laparotomy, post-operative outcomes recorded as type of conception, need of in vitro fertilization (IVF), pregnancy outcomes and complications. The staging was done based on International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO), and fertility outcomes were analysed and compared between the groups. The study included 117 cases in minimally invasive myomectomy and 53 instances in laparotomy. Multiple fibroids were more common in both groups, with no significant difference. Uterine size was significantly smaller in the minimally invasive group (p = 0.001) whereas, adhesions were more frequent in the laparotomy group (p = 0.03). IVF success rate in the minimally invasive group was 61.1%, while it was 50% in the laparotomy group. In FIGO types 0–2, conception occurred in 2.5% of the minimally invasive group, with 1.7% resulting in live births; no patients conceived in the laparotomy group. In FIGO types 6–7, 6.8% of patients in the minimally invasive group developed complications, compared to 2.6% in the laparotomy group, with live birth rates of 2.7% and 1.8%, respectively. Minimally invasive myomectomy demonstrated a favorable trend in conception and live birth rates, particularly among women with FIGO types 3–7 fibroids. While some randomized trials have reported no significant difference in pregnancy rates between laparoscopy and laparotomy, the minimally invasive approach appears to offer advantages in terms of safety and recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-026-00309-1
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the incision: a retrospective comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive myomectomy outcomes in terms of fertility

Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Anjali Suneel Mundkur, Prashanth Adiga, Muralikrishnan Nambiar et al.
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

Beyond the incision: a retrospective comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive myomectomy outcomes in terms of fertility

Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Anjali Suneel Mundkur, Prashanth Adiga, Muralikrishnan Nambiar, Pratap Kumar, Rushali Pamnani
article en

Abstract

Fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the female genital tract and are often linked to various clinical issues, including potential impairment of fertility. Surgical removal of fibroids can be performed via laparotomy, laparoscopy, or hysteroscopy. However, myomectomy can result in serious consequences. Thus, it is crucial to evaluate whether the surgery enhances fertility and, if so, to identify the most effective surgical approach. This retrospective study compared the fertility outcomes between minimally invasive myomectomy (laparoscopic and hysteroscopic) and laparotomy, post-operative outcomes recorded as type of conception, need of in vitro fertilization (IVF), pregnancy outcomes and complications. The staging was done based on International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO), and fertility outcomes were analysed and compared between the groups. The study included 117 cases in minimally invasive myomectomy and 53 instances in laparotomy. Multiple fibroids were more common in both groups, with no significant difference. Uterine size was significantly smaller in the minimally invasive group (p = 0.001) whereas, adhesions were more frequent in the laparotomy group (p = 0.03). IVF success rate in the minimally invasive group was 61.1%, while it was 50% in the laparotomy group. In FIGO types 0–2, conception occurred in 2.5% of the minimally invasive group, with 1.7% resulting in live births; no patients conceived in the laparotomy group. In FIGO types 6–7, 6.8% of patients in the minimally invasive group developed complications, compared to 2.6% in the laparotomy group, with live birth rates of 2.7% and 1.8%, respectively. Minimally invasive myomectomy demonstrated a favorable trend in conception and live birth rates, particularly among women with FIGO types 3–7 fibroids. While some randomized trials have reported no significant difference in pregnancy rates between laparoscopy and laparotomy, the minimally invasive approach appears to offer advantages in terms of safety and recovery.

Middle East Fertility Society JournalVol. 31(1)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.