Parental experiences of receiving genomic newborn screening results: findings from the BabyScreen+ study

Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) provides the potential to offer significant health benefits. However, more evidence, including psychosocial impacts on parents, is needed before gNBS is ready for population-level implementation. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore parental experiences of receiving gNBS results from a prospective study, BabyScreen+. BabyScreen+ screened 1000 newborns for >600 genetic conditions that were early-onset, severe, and had management options available (prevention, surveillance or treatment). We interviewed parents three months after receiving their result. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by Interpretive Description. Twenty-seven parents were interviewed, including nine who received a 'high chance' result for their newborn. Waiting for gNBS results was not unduly anxiety provoking. Low chance results provided psychosocial benefits including peace-of-mind and empowerment. Receiving a high chance result was unexpected and shocking, especially if the result was for a condition with significant treatment recommendations (e.g., transplantation). Psychosocial adaption to the subsequent diagnosis was an evolving process; access to genetic counselling, high-quality information and prompt referrals to specialists increased confidence in managing the condition and facilitated adaptation. All parents valued the high chance gNBS result given its clinical utility. The study provides support for gNBS by highlighting that it can provide valuable health information with minimal harms. Findings can be used to inform the implementation of population-scale gNBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02036-7
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental experiences of receiving genomic newborn screening results: findings from the BabyScreen+ study

Jade Caruana, Erin Tutty, Alison D. Archibald, Stephanie Best et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Parental experiences of receiving genomic newborn screening results: findings from the BabyScreen+ study

Jade Caruana, Erin Tutty, Alison D. Archibald, Stephanie Best, Katrina L. Scarff, Nitzan Lang, Nathasha Kugenthiran, Lilian Downie, Anaita Kanga-Parabia, Clara Gaff, Sebastian Lunke
article en

Abstract

Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) provides the potential to offer significant health benefits. However, more evidence, including psychosocial impacts on parents, is needed before gNBS is ready for population-level implementation. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore parental experiences of receiving gNBS results from a prospective study, BabyScreen+. BabyScreen+ screened 1000 newborns for >600 genetic conditions that were early-onset, severe, and had management options available (prevention, surveillance or treatment). We interviewed parents three months after receiving their result. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by Interpretive Description. Twenty-seven parents were interviewed, including nine who received a 'high chance' result for their newborn. Waiting for gNBS results was not unduly anxiety provoking. Low chance results provided psychosocial benefits including peace-of-mind and empowerment. Receiving a high chance result was unexpected and shocking, especially if the result was for a condition with significant treatment recommendations (e.g., transplantation). Psychosocial adaption to the subsequent diagnosis was an evolving process; access to genetic counselling, high-quality information and prompt referrals to specialists increased confidence in managing the condition and facilitated adaptation. All parents valued the high chance gNBS result given its clinical utility. The study provides support for gNBS by highlighting that it can provide valuable health information with minimal harms. Findings can be used to inform the implementation of population-scale gNBS.

European Journal of Human Genetics
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Australian Government, State Government of Victoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.