Recovery as Structural Property

Recovery as Structural Property proposes a structural theory of restoration in adaptive multi-agent AI systems. The paper argues that recovery cannot be defined merely as performance improvement or error reduction, but must instead be characterized by the restoration of system-level adaptive capacity. The framework introduces operational criteria for determining when recovery is complete, distinguishing transient stabilization from genuine structural restoration. Recovery is modeled as a transition in system dynamics in which exploratory diversity, feedback sensitivity, and self-correction capacity are re-established following periods of instability or metric lock-in. By defining recovery as an observable structural property rather than an external intervention outcome, the theory provides measurable indicators applicable to large-scale intelligent systems and distributed AI environments. This paper complements Self-Consistent Misalignment: Why Intelligent Systems Fail Silently Under Metric Lock-In, which characterizes the generative mechanisms of silent systemic failure. Together, the two works establish a failure–recovery framework within the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) research program.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18761660
Primary Topic
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery as Structural Property

Bin Seol
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
article

Recovery as Structural Property

Bin Seol
article en

Abstract

Recovery as Structural Property proposes a structural theory of restoration in adaptive multi-agent AI systems. The paper argues that recovery cannot be defined merely as performance improvement or error reduction, but must instead be characterized by the restoration of system-level adaptive capacity. The framework introduces operational criteria for determining when recovery is complete, distinguishing transient stabilization from genuine structural restoration. Recovery is modeled as a transition in system dynamics in which exploratory diversity, feedback sensitivity, and self-correction capacity are re-established following periods of instability or metric lock-in. By defining recovery as an observable structural property rather than an external intervention outcome, the theory provides measurable indicators applicable to large-scale intelligent systems and distributed AI environments. This paper complements Self-Consistent Misalignment: Why Intelligent Systems Fail Silently Under Metric Lock-In, which characterizes the generative mechanisms of silent systemic failure. Together, the two works establish a failure–recovery framework within the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) research program.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.