Artificial intelligence in digital service ecosystems—Towards a taxonomy and archetypes

Abstract Traditional dyadic customer-provider interactions are being shifted to polyadic interactions involving diverse participants in digital service ecosystems. Especially, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into these ecosystems, so that they comprise non-human participants (e.g., AI-based chatbots)—fundamentally altering the nature of value (co-)creation. While existing literature examines human-to-human interactions, knowledge of service interactions between human actors and AI-based systems is still underexplored. To address this research gap, we develop a taxonomy, comprising six iterations, that explores the peculiarities of AI as either a resource or a (non-human) agent in digital service ecosystems. We evaluate our taxonomy using a multiple case study and derive the four archetypes of AI in digital service ecosystems: (1) discriminative experience enhancer, (2) protective ecosystem orchestrator, (3) ecosystem innovation companion, and (4) personalized service composer. Our results extend the knowledge on service science by showing how AI-based systems—discriminative or generative, and focusing on the interaction in the ecosystem or the individual service encounter—assume the role of resources and non-human agents. Researchers and practitioners can utilize our results to augment their ecosystems with AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Markets
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-026-00879-y
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in digital service ecosystems—Towards a taxonomy and archetypes

Philipp Hansmeier, Jannika Marie Schäfer, Philipp zur Heiden
Electronic Markets
Service and Product Innovation
article

Artificial intelligence in digital service ecosystems—Towards a taxonomy and archetypes

Philipp Hansmeier, Jannika Marie Schäfer, Philipp zur Heiden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional dyadic customer-provider interactions are being shifted to polyadic interactions involving diverse participants in digital service ecosystems. Especially, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into these ecosystems, so that they comprise non-human participants (e.g., AI-based chatbots)—fundamentally altering the nature of value (co-)creation. While existing literature examines human-to-human interactions, knowledge of service interactions between human actors and AI-based systems is still underexplored. To address this research gap, we develop a taxonomy, comprising six iterations, that explores the peculiarities of AI as either a resource or a (non-human) agent in digital service ecosystems. We evaluate our taxonomy using a multiple case study and derive the four archetypes of AI in digital service ecosystems: (1) discriminative experience enhancer, (2) protective ecosystem orchestrator, (3) ecosystem innovation companion, and (4) personalized service composer. Our results extend the knowledge on service science by showing how AI-based systems—discriminative or generative, and focusing on the interaction in the ecosystem or the individual service encounter—assume the role of resources and non-human agents. Researchers and practitioners can utilize our results to augment their ecosystems with AI.

Electronic MarketsVol. 36(1)
Paderborn University (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.