Functional Fragmentation as a Structural Determinant of Agricultural Competitiveness: Evidence from the European Union

Agricultural competitiveness across European Union Member States exhibits persistent disparities that cannot be fully explained by technology, climate exposure or institutional quality in isolation. This study examines whether functional fragmentation—defined as the cumulative simultaneity of biological, technological, managerial and institutional production functions—constitutes a structural determinant of competitiveness over the period 2004–2023. Using harmonized country-level data from FAOSTAT, FADN, WDI, WGI and WMO, we construct a composite competitiveness index and a multiplicative fragmentation index and estimate two-way fixed-effects panel models. Functional fragmentation is negatively associated with competitiveness (β = −3.734, p < 0.01). A 10% reduction in fragmentation (ΔFF = −0.042) increases competitiveness by approximately 0.16 index units, corresponding to about 16% of one standard deviation. The interquartile fragmentation gap (ΔFF ≈ 0.18) implies a competitiveness difference of 0.67 units, nearly two-thirds of one standard deviation, indicating economically substantial structural effects. These results indicate that fragmentation primarily shifts the baseline level of performance rather than altering marginal responses to technological intensity or climate shocks. The findings identify functional fragmentation as a structural coordination constraint within EU agriculture and highlight the importance of systemic coherence alongside technological upgrading in competitiveness-oriented policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050493
Primary Topic
Global Trade and Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Fragmentation as a Structural Determinant of Agricultural Competitiveness: Evidence from the European Union

Minko Georgiev, Vasil Stoychev, Daniel Petrov, Veselin Krustev et al.
Agriculture
Global Trade and Competitiveness
article

Functional Fragmentation as a Structural Determinant of Agricultural Competitiveness: Evidence from the European Union

Minko Georgiev, Vasil Stoychev, Daniel Petrov, Veselin Krustev, Georgi Gopov, Dilyana Boyadzhieva
article en

Abstract

Agricultural competitiveness across European Union Member States exhibits persistent disparities that cannot be fully explained by technology, climate exposure or institutional quality in isolation. This study examines whether functional fragmentation—defined as the cumulative simultaneity of biological, technological, managerial and institutional production functions—constitutes a structural determinant of competitiveness over the period 2004–2023. Using harmonized country-level data from FAOSTAT, FADN, WDI, WGI and WMO, we construct a composite competitiveness index and a multiplicative fragmentation index and estimate two-way fixed-effects panel models. Functional fragmentation is negatively associated with competitiveness (β = −3.734, p < 0.01). A 10% reduction in fragmentation (ΔFF = −0.042) increases competitiveness by approximately 0.16 index units, corresponding to about 16% of one standard deviation. The interquartile fragmentation gap (ΔFF ≈ 0.18) implies a competitiveness difference of 0.67 units, nearly two-thirds of one standard deviation, indicating economically substantial structural effects. These results indicate that fragmentation primarily shifts the baseline level of performance rather than altering marginal responses to technological intensity or climate shocks. The findings identify functional fragmentation as a structural coordination constraint within EU agriculture and highlight the importance of systemic coherence alongside technological upgrading in competitiveness-oriented policy design.

AgricultureVol. 16(5)
Institute of Agricultural Economics (BG), Fruit Growing Institute (BG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Global Trade and Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.