Psychosocial risk factors for injury in performing artists: A scoping review of screening and assessment instruments

The performing arts is a diverse collection of disciplines, sharing an elevated risk of injury related to an array of biopsychosocial risk factors. While screening for physical risk factors is common practice, and largely routine, psychosocial screening for injury in performance artists (PAs) is less well established. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the array of instruments used to screen for, or assess, psychosocial risk factors for injury in non-recreational adult performing artists (PA)s. Additionally, psychometric evaluations of each instrument in PA cohorts were reported where available. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis guidelines. Twelve databases relating to performance, health, medicine, kinesiology, and sport were searched. Studies that investigated associations between psychosocial factors and injury in non-recreational (professional, pre-professional, full-time collegiate students, elite competitive) adult PAs were eligible. Fifty-one studies of 7,457 participants met the inclusion criteria (musicians: n = 4,505 (60.5%); dancers: n = 2,680 (35.9%); vocalists n = 225 (3.0%); circus performers: n = 47 (0.6%)). Most participants were professional PAs (n = 4,547 (61.0%)), followed by collegiate PAs (n = 1,424 (19.1%)), and mixed professional, pre-professional, elite competitive, and collegiate cohorts (n = 1,486 (19.9%)). Forty-five different psychosocial factors were identified across 90 distinct instruments. Stress, anxiety, depression and perfectionism were the factors most frequently investigated. Stress was commonly reported across all PA cohorts. The reliability of just 19 (21%) instruments was established for the target cohort. Many other instruments were valid/reliable in patient, sporting or general population cohorts, but untested in PAs. A common link between many psychosocial risk factors and injury in non-recreational adult PAs was identified. Screening programmes should incorporate comprehensive evaluations of these factors. Instruments appropriate for the cohort investigated should be used where available. The development and/or validation of instruments for use across all PAs for common risk factors should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322971
Primary Topic
Musicians’ Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial risk factors for injury in performing artists: A scoping review of screening and assessment instruments

Caoimhe Barry Walsh, Hannah Fahey, Róisín Cahalan, Michele L. Pye et al.
PLoS ONE
Musicians’ Health and Performance
article

Psychosocial risk factors for injury in performing artists: A scoping review of screening and assessment instruments

Caoimhe Barry Walsh, Hannah Fahey, Róisín Cahalan, Michele L. Pye, Orfhlaith Ni Bhriain, Rose Schmieg, Breandán de Gallaí
article en

Abstract

The performing arts is a diverse collection of disciplines, sharing an elevated risk of injury related to an array of biopsychosocial risk factors. While screening for physical risk factors is common practice, and largely routine, psychosocial screening for injury in performance artists (PAs) is less well established. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the array of instruments used to screen for, or assess, psychosocial risk factors for injury in non-recreational adult performing artists (PA)s. Additionally, psychometric evaluations of each instrument in PA cohorts were reported where available. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis guidelines. Twelve databases relating to performance, health, medicine, kinesiology, and sport were searched. Studies that investigated associations between psychosocial factors and injury in non-recreational (professional, pre-professional, full-time collegiate students, elite competitive) adult PAs were eligible. Fifty-one studies of 7,457 participants met the inclusion criteria (musicians: n = 4,505 (60.5%); dancers: n = 2,680 (35.9%); vocalists n = 225 (3.0%); circus performers: n = 47 (0.6%)). Most participants were professional PAs (n = 4,547 (61.0%)), followed by collegiate PAs (n = 1,424 (19.1%)), and mixed professional, pre-professional, elite competitive, and collegiate cohorts (n = 1,486 (19.9%)). Forty-five different psychosocial factors were identified across 90 distinct instruments. Stress, anxiety, depression and perfectionism were the factors most frequently investigated. Stress was commonly reported across all PA cohorts. The reliability of just 19 (21%) instruments was established for the target cohort. Many other instruments were valid/reliable in patient, sporting or general population cohorts, but untested in PAs. A common link between many psychosocial risk factors and injury in non-recreational adult PAs was identified. Screening programmes should incorporate comprehensive evaluations of these factors. Instruments appropriate for the cohort investigated should be used where available. The development and/or validation of instruments for use across all PAs for common risk factors should be considered.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Howard University (US), Shenandoah University (US), University of Limerick (IE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Musicians’ Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.