Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians

Bayesian methods offer an intuitive and coherent statistical framework for updating probabilistic beliefs by integrating prior knowledge-whether from existing data or expert consensus-with new evidence via likelihood functions to generate posterior probability distributions. This approach yields clinically meaningful outputs, such as credible intervals and probabilities of treatment benefit, and can incorporate thresholds relevant to practice, like the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). Recent advances in computation-including Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, and probabilistic programming languages like Stan and JAGS- have made Bayesian approaches feasible even for complex hierarchical models. In perioperative medicine, these methods are particularly valuable for (1) complementing trial results by quantifying clinically important effects in the context of statistically nonsignificant findings or modest probabilities of benefit despite statistical significance, (2) enhancing meta-analyses through coherent integration of heterogeneous studies and sparse data, and (3) enabling adaptive and platform trial designs through continuous evidence synthesis. The ability to incorporate informative priors can complement existing knowledge, especially in small-sample studies, which are common in perioperative medicine, where traditional approaches provide insufficient precision. Although concerns remain regarding subjectivity in prior specification, these are increasingly addressed through structured guidelines, benchmark priors, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Altogether, Bayesian methods provide a flexible and powerful alternative for generating actionable insights in complex clinical settings, including in perioperative care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perioperative Medicine
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00659-4
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians

David M. van Meenen, Guido Mazzinari, Michael O. Harhay, Fernando G. Zampieri et al.
Perioperative Medicine
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians

David M. van Meenen, Guido Mazzinari, Michael O. Harhay, Fernando G. Zampieri, Marcus J. Schultz, Ary Serpa-Neto
article en

Abstract

Bayesian methods offer an intuitive and coherent statistical framework for updating probabilistic beliefs by integrating prior knowledge-whether from existing data or expert consensus-with new evidence via likelihood functions to generate posterior probability distributions. This approach yields clinically meaningful outputs, such as credible intervals and probabilities of treatment benefit, and can incorporate thresholds relevant to practice, like the region of practical equivalence (ROPE). Recent advances in computation-including Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms, and probabilistic programming languages like Stan and JAGS- have made Bayesian approaches feasible even for complex hierarchical models. In perioperative medicine, these methods are particularly valuable for (1) complementing trial results by quantifying clinically important effects in the context of statistically nonsignificant findings or modest probabilities of benefit despite statistical significance, (2) enhancing meta-analyses through coherent integration of heterogeneous studies and sparse data, and (3) enabling adaptive and platform trial designs through continuous evidence synthesis. The ability to incorporate informative priors can complement existing knowledge, especially in small-sample studies, which are common in perioperative medicine, where traditional approaches provide insufficient precision. Although concerns remain regarding subjectivity in prior specification, these are increasingly addressed through structured guidelines, benchmark priors, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Altogether, Bayesian methods provide a flexible and powerful alternative for generating actionable insights in complex clinical settings, including in perioperative care.

Perioperative Medicine
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Universitat de València (ES), Mahidol University (TH), Medical Protective (US), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Austin Hospital (AU), Vienna General Hospital (AT), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), University of Oxford (GB), Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU), Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (TH), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES), Monash University (AU), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.