Drug-coated balloons in complex large-vessel coronary artery disease: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future perspectives

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are emerging as a valuable alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in the context of complex coronary artery disease (CAD). While DES remain the standard of care in PCI, their use is associated with several well-recognized limitations, including impairment of vascular physiology, inhibition of positive remodeling, and a persistent risk, estimated at approximately 2% per year, of stent-related adverse events, which increases with increasing stent length and anatomical and clinical complexity. DCBs deliver antiproliferative agents without leaving a permanent metallic scaffold, offering the potential to reduce stent burden, preserve native vessel physiology, and shorten the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. Their efficacy is well established in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and <i>de novo</i> lesions in small vessels (SVD). However, the use of DCBs in large-vessel and complex lesions (such as bifurcations, long lesions, and chronic total occlusions) remains under investigation. Preliminary observational data suggest feasibility and potential benefits, particularly in carefully selected cases with adequate lesion preparation. This review synthesizes current pathophysiological insights, procedural considerations, and clinical data on the use of DCBs in complex large-vessel CAD and underscores the need for large-scale randomized trials to define their long-term safety and efficacy in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1731952
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug-coated balloons in complex large-vessel coronary artery disease: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future perspectives

Pier Pasquale Leone, Alessandro Gabrielli, Jorge Sanz-Sánchez, Damiano null Regazzoli et al.
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Drug-coated balloons in complex large-vessel coronary artery disease: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future perspectives

Pier Pasquale Leone, Alessandro Gabrielli, Jorge Sanz-Sánchez, Damiano null Regazzoli, Azeem null Latib, F Tartaglia, A C Colombo, Mauro Gitto, Valentina Bernardini, Bernhard Reimers, Antonio Mangieri, Giulio G. Stefanini
article en

Abstract

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are emerging as a valuable alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in the context of complex coronary artery disease (CAD). While DES remain the standard of care in PCI, their use is associated with several well-recognized limitations, including impairment of vascular physiology, inhibition of positive remodeling, and a persistent risk, estimated at approximately 2% per year, of stent-related adverse events, which increases with increasing stent length and anatomical and clinical complexity. DCBs deliver antiproliferative agents without leaving a permanent metallic scaffold, offering the potential to reduce stent burden, preserve native vessel physiology, and shorten the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. Their efficacy is well established in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and <i>de novo</i> lesions in small vessels (SVD). However, the use of DCBs in large-vessel and complex lesions (such as bifurcations, long lesions, and chronic total occlusions) remains under investigation. Preliminary observational data suggest feasibility and potential benefits, particularly in carefully selected cases with adequate lesion preparation. This review synthesizes current pathophysiological insights, procedural considerations, and clinical data on the use of DCBs in complex large-vessel CAD and underscores the need for large-scale randomized trials to define their long-term safety and efficacy in this setting.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Humanitas University (IT), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), EMO GVM Centro Cuore Columbus (IT), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (ES), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.