Athletics performance in Olympic Games: a Network Data Envelopment Analysis approach

This paper presents a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) model to evaluate the performance of countries in Olympic athletics, distinguishing between qualification and participation stages. Unlike traditional methods, it includes all nations, regardless of medal wins, ensuring a more inclusive assessment. The model addresses the Constant-Sum-of-Outputs (CSO) constraint by scaling results relative to total points available in each Games. The two-stage framework first evaluates a country’s ability to qualify athletes, then assesses their competition performance. Three efficiency indicators—qualification, participation, and overall system efficiency—are introduced. Additionally, the Relative Athletics Gender Advancement (RAGA) index measures gender disparities by comparing rankings in men’s and women’s events. Findings seem to indicate that while some nations promote gender equality, most still favor men in elite athletics. It was also found that some developing countries (e.g. Kenya and Ethiopia) display more gender equality in their Olympic Games Athletics policies than developed countries such as USA, Brazil or UK. Overall, the analysis shows a strong correlation between consistent performance and high rankings, with dominant nations maintaining their positions through sustained excellence, while others rely on occasional successes to achieve notable efficiencies. This methodology is adaptable to other sports and competitive contexts beyond the Olympic Games.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2631817
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Athletics performance in Olympic Games: a Network Data Envelopment Analysis approach

Gabriel Villa, Sebastián Lozano
Cogent Social Sciences
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Athletics performance in Olympic Games: a Network Data Envelopment Analysis approach

Gabriel Villa, Sebastián Lozano
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) model to evaluate the performance of countries in Olympic athletics, distinguishing between qualification and participation stages. Unlike traditional methods, it includes all nations, regardless of medal wins, ensuring a more inclusive assessment. The model addresses the Constant-Sum-of-Outputs (CSO) constraint by scaling results relative to total points available in each Games. The two-stage framework first evaluates a country’s ability to qualify athletes, then assesses their competition performance. Three efficiency indicators—qualification, participation, and overall system efficiency—are introduced. Additionally, the Relative Athletics Gender Advancement (RAGA) index measures gender disparities by comparing rankings in men’s and women’s events. Findings seem to indicate that while some nations promote gender equality, most still favor men in elite athletics. It was also found that some developing countries (e.g. Kenya and Ethiopia) display more gender equality in their Olympic Games Athletics policies than developed countries such as USA, Brazil or UK. Overall, the analysis shows a strong correlation between consistent performance and high rankings, with dominant nations maintaining their positions through sustained excellence, while others rely on occasional successes to achieve notable efficiencies. This methodology is adaptable to other sports and competitive contexts beyond the Olympic Games.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 12(1)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.