Rethinking Neonatal Body Proportions: Upper Segment to Lower Segment Ratios in a Rural South Indian Cohort

Introduction The upper segment to lower segment (US:LS) ratio is a key anthropometric measure for assessing body proportions in children, which provides insight into disorders with disproportionate growth. However, body proportions are governed by ethnic, genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors. This study aimed to establish US:LS ratio reference values in live-born neonates from rural Telangana, India; compare US:LS ratios across sex, gestational age categories, birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status; and assess whether Western normative values apply to this population. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and December 2021, at MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, and 998 neonates were enrolled. Crown-heel length was measured with an infantometer, and the lower segment from pubic symphysis to heel with the help of an inch tape, and the upper segment was derived by subtraction. Neonates were classified by sex, gestational age (preterm, term, post-term), birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status, and their US:LS ratio was compared. Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between two groups. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) was used for comparing more than two groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study included 998 neonates, of whom 530 (53.1%) were males, and 468 (46.9%) were females. The mean gestational age ± SD was 38.16 ± 1.29 weeks. The overall mean US:LS ratio was 1.511 ± 0.13. Male neonates exhibited a significantly higher ratio than females (1.519 ± 0.14 vs. 1.502 ± 0.13; p = 0.048). Preterm neonates had a significantly higher mean ratio compared to term infants (1.56 ± 0.15 vs. 1.510 ± 0.13; p = 0.0031). Among gestational age groups, only the comparison between < 32 weeks and 37-39 weeks reached significance (p = 0.0083). Conclusion The mean US:LS ratio of neonates is lower than the typical values available in the literature. There is a gender difference observed with male neonates having a greater US:LS ratio. The mean US:LS ratio differs between preterm and term neonates. There is a need for further large-scale multicentric population-level studies on the US:LS ratio among Indian children. Clinicians should consider population-specific reference values when evaluating neonates for suspected skeletal dysplasia or disproportionate growth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104193
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Neonatal Body Proportions: Upper Segment to Lower Segment Ratios in a Rural South Indian Cohort

Preethi Subramanian, Sudharshanraj Chitgupikar, Manohar Bekkam, Vinitha Arjula et al.
Cureus
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Rethinking Neonatal Body Proportions: Upper Segment to Lower Segment Ratios in a Rural South Indian Cohort

Preethi Subramanian, Sudharshanraj Chitgupikar, Manohar Bekkam, Vinitha Arjula, Laxman Sanepu, Nikitha Pasam
article en

Abstract

Introduction The upper segment to lower segment (US:LS) ratio is a key anthropometric measure for assessing body proportions in children, which provides insight into disorders with disproportionate growth. However, body proportions are governed by ethnic, genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors. This study aimed to establish US:LS ratio reference values in live-born neonates from rural Telangana, India; compare US:LS ratios across sex, gestational age categories, birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status; and assess whether Western normative values apply to this population. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and December 2021, at MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, and 998 neonates were enrolled. Crown-heel length was measured with an infantometer, and the lower segment from pubic symphysis to heel with the help of an inch tape, and the upper segment was derived by subtraction. Neonates were classified by sex, gestational age (preterm, term, post-term), birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status, and their US:LS ratio was compared. Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between two groups. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) was used for comparing more than two groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study included 998 neonates, of whom 530 (53.1%) were males, and 468 (46.9%) were females. The mean gestational age ± SD was 38.16 ± 1.29 weeks. The overall mean US:LS ratio was 1.511 ± 0.13. Male neonates exhibited a significantly higher ratio than females (1.519 ± 0.14 vs. 1.502 ± 0.13; p = 0.048). Preterm neonates had a significantly higher mean ratio compared to term infants (1.56 ± 0.15 vs. 1.510 ± 0.13; p = 0.0031). Among gestational age groups, only the comparison between < 32 weeks and 37-39 weeks reached significance (p = 0.0083). Conclusion The mean US:LS ratio of neonates is lower than the typical values available in the literature. There is a gender difference observed with male neonates having a greater US:LS ratio. The mean US:LS ratio differs between preterm and term neonates. There is a need for further large-scale multicentric population-level studies on the US:LS ratio among Indian children. Clinicians should consider population-specific reference values when evaluating neonates for suspected skeletal dysplasia or disproportionate growth.

Cureus
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.