Evaluation policies in philanthropic foundations: Ideals and realities

Foundations play an important role in modern societies, but not much is known about the quality and outcomes of the many diverse activities they support. There is an increasing interest in evaluation policy as a systematic approach to evaluation in foundations. We study the extent to which foundations in Denmark publish an explicit evaluation policy, as well as their requirements on grantees and the evaluative information that foundations offer back to stakeholders and society. Based on a systematic study of the websites of a representative sample of 20 foundations, we find that only three have explicit evaluation policies, and they are not very comprehensive. The majority of foundations do not engage in evaluation, and many do not provide any substantial evaluative information on their website. We offer the extraction/public provision ratio (EPPR) as a conceptual device for further studies. We also discuss barriers and potential improvements in foundations’ engagement with evaluation policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890251405242
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation policies in philanthropic foundations: Ideals and realities

Peter Dahler‐Larsen
Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Evaluation policies in philanthropic foundations: Ideals and realities

Peter Dahler‐Larsen
article en

Abstract

Foundations play an important role in modern societies, but not much is known about the quality and outcomes of the many diverse activities they support. There is an increasing interest in evaluation policy as a systematic approach to evaluation in foundations. We study the extent to which foundations in Denmark publish an explicit evaluation policy, as well as their requirements on grantees and the evaluative information that foundations offer back to stakeholders and society. Based on a systematic study of the websites of a representative sample of 20 foundations, we find that only three have explicit evaluation policies, and they are not very comprehensive. The majority of foundations do not engage in evaluation, and many do not provide any substantial evaluative information on their website. We offer the extraction/public provision ratio (EPPR) as a conceptual device for further studies. We also discuss barriers and potential improvements in foundations’ engagement with evaluation policy.

Evaluation
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.