A novel risk-scoring system based on endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics for the preoperative diagnosis of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The preoperative differentiation of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other submucosal lesions remains clinically challenging due to overlapping endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk-scoring system integrating EUS imaging and clinical characteristics to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy for small gastric GISTs versus non-GIST submucosal tumors. We retrospectively analyzed 1303 patients with gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), who were divided into a training cohort (n = 670), an internal validation cohort (n = 287), and an external validation cohort (n = 346). Clinical and EUS characteristics were compared between small GISTs and non-GIST SMTs. Independent predictive factors identified through multivariate logistic regression were used to construct a risk-scoring model. The model’s diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy. Small gastric GISTs accounted for 614 cases (47.1%). Four independent predictors were identified: tumor location in the cardia/fundus (1 points), origin within the muscularis propria (2 points), hypoechoic echogenicity (1 point), and extraluminal growth pattern (2 points). The scoring system demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with AUCs of 0.776 (95%CI: 0.727–0.826) in the internal and 0.844 (95%CI: 0.805–0.884) in the external validation cohorts. Sensitivities were 0.867 (95%CI: 0.800–0.918) and 0.828 (95%CI: 0.767–0.878), and NPVs were 0.827 and 0.785, respectively. Risk stratification revealed that in the internal cohort, 17.3% of lesions were low-risk (0–2 points), 52.8% intermediate-risk (3–4 points), and 96.2% high-risk (5–6 points). Corresponding proportions in the external cohort were 21.5%, 73.9%, and 95.0%. The proposed EUS-based risk-scoring system shows robust performance in preoperatively diagnosing small gastric GISTs. It holds promise for improving clinical decision-making and optimizing treatment strategies by enabling non-invasive and accurate risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41599-9
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel risk-scoring system based on endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics for the preoperative diagnosis of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Chao Ma, Luojie Liu, Zi Wang, Xiaodan Xu et al.
Scientific Reports
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

A novel risk-scoring system based on endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics for the preoperative diagnosis of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Chao Ma, Luojie Liu, Zi Wang, Xiaodan Xu, Y. F. Shi, Yunfu Feng, Sijie Zheng, Jian Chen, Bin He
article en

Abstract

The preoperative differentiation of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other submucosal lesions remains clinically challenging due to overlapping endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk-scoring system integrating EUS imaging and clinical characteristics to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy for small gastric GISTs versus non-GIST submucosal tumors. We retrospectively analyzed 1303 patients with gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), who were divided into a training cohort (n = 670), an internal validation cohort (n = 287), and an external validation cohort (n = 346). Clinical and EUS characteristics were compared between small GISTs and non-GIST SMTs. Independent predictive factors identified through multivariate logistic regression were used to construct a risk-scoring model. The model’s diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy. Small gastric GISTs accounted for 614 cases (47.1%). Four independent predictors were identified: tumor location in the cardia/fundus (1 points), origin within the muscularis propria (2 points), hypoechoic echogenicity (1 point), and extraluminal growth pattern (2 points). The scoring system demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with AUCs of 0.776 (95%CI: 0.727–0.826) in the internal and 0.844 (95%CI: 0.805–0.884) in the external validation cohorts. Sensitivities were 0.867 (95%CI: 0.800–0.918) and 0.828 (95%CI: 0.767–0.878), and NPVs were 0.827 and 0.785, respectively. Risk stratification revealed that in the internal cohort, 17.3% of lesions were low-risk (0–2 points), 52.8% intermediate-risk (3–4 points), and 96.2% high-risk (5–6 points). Corresponding proportions in the external cohort were 21.5%, 73.9%, and 95.0%. The proposed EUS-based risk-scoring system shows robust performance in preoperatively diagnosing small gastric GISTs. It holds promise for improving clinical decision-making and optimizing treatment strategies by enabling non-invasive and accurate risk stratification.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Jiangsu University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital (CN), First People's Hospital of Kunshan (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.