Nietzsche and interpersonal communication: The significance of self-knowledge in interpersonal justice

This article argues that Friedrich Nietzsche offers a generative contribution to communication ethics through his conception of self-knowledge as a rhetorical and symbolic practice. Drawing especially on The Gay Science and On the Genealogy of Morality , the article interprets Nietzsche’s aesthetic ideal not as moral relativism, but as an ethical demand to become the kind of self who can relate justly. In contrast to rationalist or rule-based ethics, Nietzsche offers a model of intrapersonal justice grounded in coherence, stylistic integrity and symbolic self-formation. The article places Nietzsche in dialogue with communication ethics scholars, rhetorical theorists and the continental tradition, developing a view of justice as responsive presence rather than prescriptive conformity. By doing this, it advances an existential-ethical account of communication as the space where the self becomes answerable to the other. Nietzsche emerges not as an enemy of ethics, but as a thinker of moral formation whose insights deepen our understanding of rhetorical subjectivity and interpersonal responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00072_1
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche and interpersonal communication: The significance of self-knowledge in interpersonal justice

Andri Kosasih
Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

Nietzsche and interpersonal communication: The significance of self-knowledge in interpersonal justice

Andri Kosasih
article en

Abstract

This article argues that Friedrich Nietzsche offers a generative contribution to communication ethics through his conception of self-knowledge as a rhetorical and symbolic practice. Drawing especially on The Gay Science and On the Genealogy of Morality , the article interprets Nietzsche’s aesthetic ideal not as moral relativism, but as an ethical demand to become the kind of self who can relate justly. In contrast to rationalist or rule-based ethics, Nietzsche offers a model of intrapersonal justice grounded in coherence, stylistic integrity and symbolic self-formation. The article places Nietzsche in dialogue with communication ethics scholars, rhetorical theorists and the continental tradition, developing a view of justice as responsive presence rather than prescriptive conformity. By doing this, it advances an existential-ethical account of communication as the space where the self becomes answerable to the other. Nietzsche emerges not as an enemy of ethics, but as a thinker of moral formation whose insights deepen our understanding of rhetorical subjectivity and interpersonal responsibility.

Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
Duquesne University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.