Investigating the role of serum IL-6 in predicting outcomes of b-cell depleting therapy in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: B-cell depletion, baseline IL-6 levels have been hypothesized to predict disease activity and long-term outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the prognostic value of serum IL-6 in OCR-treated patients remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether baseline and longitudinal serum IL-6 levels can predict clinical and radiological outcomes in OCR-treated MS patients. METHODS: This exploratory, single-center retrospective cohort study included 73 patients with Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS, n = 30) or primary progressive MS (PPMS, n = 43) who initiated OCR at University Hospital Düsseldorf between 2018 and 2025. Baseline serum IL-6 was compared with 86 healthy controls (HC) and correlated with clinical, radiological, and biomarker outcomes over 24 months. Clinical endpoints included confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and relapse-associated worsening (RAW), alongside MRI activity and Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) and Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (sGFAP) levels. Between-group comparisons used Welch's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, paired longitudinal comparisons used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and associations between baseline biomarkers and outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression, multivariable linear or logistic regression, and rank-based linear models for IL-6. RESULTS: Baseline serum IL-6 levels showed no significant differences between the overall MS cohort and HC (p = 0.178), nor between RRMS and PPMS subgroups (p = 0.024; adjusted post-hoc p > 0.05). No baseline biomarker, including IL-6 (HR 1.83; 95% CI 0.73-4.61; p = 0.989), sNfL, and sGFAP predicted disease activity. Longitudinal analysis under OCR revealed largely stable IL-6 concentrations but patients maintaining No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) showed 50% reduction in IL-6 at 12 months (mean change - 1.30 pg/mL, p = 0.0318), whereas those with loss of NEDA-3 remained stable (mean change 0.09 pg/mL). CONCLUSION: Baseline serum IL-6 alone is insufficient to predict clinical or radiological outcomes in OCR-treated MS patients. However, the significant longitudinal decline specifically in stable patients suggests that IL-6 dynamics, rather than static baseline measures, may better reflect sustained therapeutic response. These findings underscore the limited utility of serum IL-6 alone as a biomarker and support further exploration of longitudinal, multiparametric approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Neurology
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-026-05252-2
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the role of serum IL-6 in predicting outcomes of b-cell depleting therapy in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study

Niklas Huntemann, Tristan Kölsche, Lars Masanneck, Karin Schulze-Bosse et al.
BMC Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Investigating the role of serum IL-6 in predicting outcomes of b-cell depleting therapy in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study

Niklas Huntemann, Tristan Kölsche, Lars Masanneck, Karin Schulze-Bosse, Patricia Kirschner, Ramona Hagler, Tobias Ruck, Marc Pawlitzki, Joshua M. Boeckers, Orhan Aktas, Sven G. Meuth, Bela Jesaja Kutsojannis, Marc Müller
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: B-cell depletion, baseline IL-6 levels have been hypothesized to predict disease activity and long-term outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the prognostic value of serum IL-6 in OCR-treated patients remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether baseline and longitudinal serum IL-6 levels can predict clinical and radiological outcomes in OCR-treated MS patients. METHODS: This exploratory, single-center retrospective cohort study included 73 patients with Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS, n = 30) or primary progressive MS (PPMS, n = 43) who initiated OCR at University Hospital Düsseldorf between 2018 and 2025. Baseline serum IL-6 was compared with 86 healthy controls (HC) and correlated with clinical, radiological, and biomarker outcomes over 24 months. Clinical endpoints included confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and relapse-associated worsening (RAW), alongside MRI activity and Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) and Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (sGFAP) levels. Between-group comparisons used Welch's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, paired longitudinal comparisons used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and associations between baseline biomarkers and outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression, multivariable linear or logistic regression, and rank-based linear models for IL-6. RESULTS: Baseline serum IL-6 levels showed no significant differences between the overall MS cohort and HC (p = 0.178), nor between RRMS and PPMS subgroups (p = 0.024; adjusted post-hoc p > 0.05). No baseline biomarker, including IL-6 (HR 1.83; 95% CI 0.73-4.61; p = 0.989), sNfL, and sGFAP predicted disease activity. Longitudinal analysis under OCR revealed largely stable IL-6 concentrations but patients maintaining No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) showed 50% reduction in IL-6 at 12 months (mean change - 1.30 pg/mL, p = 0.0318), whereas those with loss of NEDA-3 remained stable (mean change 0.09 pg/mL). CONCLUSION: Baseline serum IL-6 alone is insufficient to predict clinical or radiological outcomes in OCR-treated MS patients. However, the significant longitudinal decline specifically in stable patients suggests that IL-6 dynamics, rather than static baseline measures, may better reflect sustained therapeutic response. These findings underscore the limited utility of serum IL-6 alone as a biomarker and support further exploration of longitudinal, multiparametric approaches.

BMC NeurologyVol. 26(1)
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Biogen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Amicus Therapeutics, Argenx, Alzheimer Society, Multiple Sclerosis Society, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Daimler und Benz Stiftung, Deutschen Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie, Deutsche Alzheimer Gesellschaft, Neuraxpharm, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, Bayer Vital, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.