Standardization and Validation of Scalp Surface Area Measurement and Assessment of Interchangeability Between Two Independent Methodologies for Head Crown Area and Total Hair Count Measurement

Background Hair loss significantly affects physical appearance and psychological well-being, leading to increased use of hair growth and hair loss prevention treatments. Accurate and reproducible assessment of scalp and head crown surface area and hair count is essential for evaluation in clinical and cosmetic clinical studies with hair care products. Objective and method This prospective, single-visit standardization and validation study included adult participants aged 18 to 55 years. Scalp surface area measurements were performed in 25 adult participants using a calibrated measuring tape. Head crown (vertex) surface area measurements, including the frontal and mid-scalp regions, were performed in 25 adult participants using a calibrated measuring tape and photographic image analysis with Image-Pro software. For hair count assessment, global 90° head photographs obtained from in-house data of 50 participants were analyzed using phototrichogram (PTG)-based CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro software. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using appropriate method-comparison statistical analyses. Result The scalp surface area mean was 492.36 ± 30.97 cm². For head crown, including frontal and mid-scalp area measurements, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal systematic bias with acceptable limits of agreement (LoA) between the calibrated measuring tape and Image-Pro analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75 indicates good reliability and consistency between the two measurement methods, while the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.74 reflects moderate agreement when both precision and accuracy are considered. Hair count assessment using CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro analysis also showed good agreement in hair counts, with small average differences and expected LoA. Conclusion This standardization and validation study demonstrated acceptable agreement between measure-tape-based calculated and image-based methods for head crown area assessment, including the frontal and mid-scalp regions. Additionally, acceptable agreement was observed between CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro software for hair count evaluation. These findings support the interchangeable use of measure-tape-based and image-based methods for head crown area measurement, as well as the reliability of CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro-based analyses for hair count assessment in hair care product testing and clinical and cosmetic hair research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104173
Primary Topic
Hair Growth and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardization and Validation of Scalp Surface Area Measurement and Assessment of Interchangeability Between Two Independent Methodologies for Head Crown Area and Total Hair Count Measurement

Maheshvari Patel, Nayan Patel
Cureus
Hair Growth and Disorders
article

Standardization and Validation of Scalp Surface Area Measurement and Assessment of Interchangeability Between Two Independent Methodologies for Head Crown Area and Total Hair Count Measurement

Maheshvari Patel, Nayan Patel
article en

Abstract

Background Hair loss significantly affects physical appearance and psychological well-being, leading to increased use of hair growth and hair loss prevention treatments. Accurate and reproducible assessment of scalp and head crown surface area and hair count is essential for evaluation in clinical and cosmetic clinical studies with hair care products. Objective and method This prospective, single-visit standardization and validation study included adult participants aged 18 to 55 years. Scalp surface area measurements were performed in 25 adult participants using a calibrated measuring tape. Head crown (vertex) surface area measurements, including the frontal and mid-scalp regions, were performed in 25 adult participants using a calibrated measuring tape and photographic image analysis with Image-Pro software. For hair count assessment, global 90° head photographs obtained from in-house data of 50 participants were analyzed using phototrichogram (PTG)-based CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro software. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using appropriate method-comparison statistical analyses. Result The scalp surface area mean was 492.36 ± 30.97 cm². For head crown, including frontal and mid-scalp area measurements, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal systematic bias with acceptable limits of agreement (LoA) between the calibrated measuring tape and Image-Pro analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75 indicates good reliability and consistency between the two measurement methods, while the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.74 reflects moderate agreement when both precision and accuracy are considered. Hair count assessment using CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro analysis also showed good agreement in hair counts, with small average differences and expected LoA. Conclusion This standardization and validation study demonstrated acceptable agreement between measure-tape-based calculated and image-based methods for head crown area assessment, including the frontal and mid-scalp regions. Additionally, acceptable agreement was observed between CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro software for hair count evaluation. These findings support the interchangeable use of measure-tape-based and image-based methods for head crown area measurement, as well as the reliability of CASLite NOVA and Image-Pro-based analyses for hair count assessment in hair care product testing and clinical and cosmetic hair research.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Hair Growth and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.