The prognostic impact of cardioselectivity of beta-blockers prescribed during hospitalization for decompensated heart failure

Abstract Background Beta-blockers (BBs) show considerable variation in cardioselectivity (i.e., the relative affinity to the β 1 receptor), even among those with evidence of benefit in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate whether the cardioselectivity of BBs prescribed at discharge from hospitalization for decompensated HF will affect the long-term prognosis of patients. Methods In the prospective study, we followed 4053 patients hospitalized for decompesated HF. The entire cohort was divided into subgroups based on the cardioselectivity of the BBs prescribed at discharge. Results After complex adjustment, patients treated with a highly selective BBs (bisoprolol) showed significantly lower five-year cardiovascular mortality than those with a lesser degree of cardioselectivity (mainly metoprolol) [HRR 0.69 (95%CIs:0.52–0.92), p = 0.011]. This difference remained in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [HRR 0.58 (95%CIs:0.37–0.89), p = 0.013], but was not yet significant in HF with preserved ejection fraction [HRR 0.66 (95%CIs:0.43–1.02), p = 0.063]. In HFrEF patients only, highly cardioselective BBs also showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality than nonselective BBs with α-blocking activity (mainly carvedilol) [HRR 0.55 (95%CIs:0.33–0.93, p = 0.025]. Conclusion The choice of a beta-blocker regarding the degree of its cardioselectivity may have a prognostic impact in chronic HF patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacological Reports
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-026-00927-6
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The prognostic impact of cardioselectivity of beta-blockers prescribed during hospitalization for decompensated heart failure

Jan Filipovský, O Mayer, Josef Jirák
1 links
Pharmacological Reports
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

The prognostic impact of cardioselectivity of beta-blockers prescribed during hospitalization for decompensated heart failure

Jan Filipovský, O Mayer, Josef Jirák
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Beta-blockers (BBs) show considerable variation in cardioselectivity (i.e., the relative affinity to the β 1 receptor), even among those with evidence of benefit in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate whether the cardioselectivity of BBs prescribed at discharge from hospitalization for decompensated HF will affect the long-term prognosis of patients. Methods In the prospective study, we followed 4053 patients hospitalized for decompesated HF. The entire cohort was divided into subgroups based on the cardioselectivity of the BBs prescribed at discharge. Results After complex adjustment, patients treated with a highly selective BBs (bisoprolol) showed significantly lower five-year cardiovascular mortality than those with a lesser degree of cardioselectivity (mainly metoprolol) [HRR 0.69 (95%CIs:0.52–0.92), p = 0.011]. This difference remained in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [HRR 0.58 (95%CIs:0.37–0.89), p = 0.013], but was not yet significant in HF with preserved ejection fraction [HRR 0.66 (95%CIs:0.43–1.02), p = 0.063]. In HFrEF patients only, highly cardioselective BBs also showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality than nonselective BBs with α-blocking activity (mainly carvedilol) [HRR 0.55 (95%CIs:0.33–0.93, p = 0.025]. Conclusion The choice of a beta-blocker regarding the degree of its cardioselectivity may have a prognostic impact in chronic HF patients.

Pharmacological Reports
Charles University (CZ), University Hospital Plzen (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon