Efficient talent identification in women’s football: A ranking-based approach for goal scoring analysis

Individual goal-scoring analysis in women's football faces severe class imbalance and limited scouting resources, where classification metrics alone do not capture operational efficiency. We analyzed 2,535 non-goalkeeper player-match observations from the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup (736 unique players) with 51 performance features, excluding match-outcome variables to emphasize individual actions. Using nested cross-validation, LightGBM captured 79.4% of goal-scoring observations within the top 20% of ranked observations; an out-of-bag (OOB) bootstrap gains analysis yielded 73.9% capture at Top 20% (lift = 3.69x; 95% CI: 63.9%-84.3%). Permutation and SHAP consensus highlighted tactical availability (Total Offers) and combined technical/physical workload indicators (Passes Attempted, Jogging Distance, Top Speed). This proof-of-concept study shows that ranking-based evaluation improves scouting efficiency using basic match statistics, while thresholds and feature weights require validation in other competitive contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342115
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient talent identification in women’s football: A ranking-based approach for goal scoring analysis

Songyi Song, Hee-Su Kim
PLoS ONE
Sports Performance and Training
article

Efficient talent identification in women’s football: A ranking-based approach for goal scoring analysis

Songyi Song, Hee-Su Kim
article en

Abstract

Individual goal-scoring analysis in women's football faces severe class imbalance and limited scouting resources, where classification metrics alone do not capture operational efficiency. We analyzed 2,535 non-goalkeeper player-match observations from the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup (736 unique players) with 51 performance features, excluding match-outcome variables to emphasize individual actions. Using nested cross-validation, LightGBM captured 79.4% of goal-scoring observations within the top 20% of ranked observations; an out-of-bag (OOB) bootstrap gains analysis yielded 73.9% capture at Top 20% (lift = 3.69x; 95% CI: 63.9%-84.3%). Permutation and SHAP consensus highlighted tactical availability (Total Offers) and combined technical/physical workload indicators (Passes Attempted, Jogging Distance, Top Speed). This proof-of-concept study shows that ranking-based evaluation improves scouting efficiency using basic match statistics, while thresholds and feature weights require validation in other competitive contexts.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR), Dankook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.