HCC Recurrence After Curative Intent Treatment: The Need for New High-Risk Criteria in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy

Background and Aim: Adjuvant therapy after curative intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant unmet need. The IMbrave050 study demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with high-risk HCC receiving adjuvant atezolizumab and bevacizumab post-curative treatment compared to active surveillance. However, the IMbrave050 cohort was predominantly Asian, largely underwent surgical resection, and had chronic liver disease (CLD) mainly due to hepatitis B features that differ markedly from the Australian setting, where microwave ablation (MWA) is more common and hepatitis B-related CLD is less prevalent. Given these differences, this study aimed to explore the performance of the IMbrave050 risk criteria in an Australian population of patients with early-stage HCC undergoing curative treatment to determine if the criteria identified patients with a high risk of recurrence who may benefit from adjuvant treatment. Method: We performed a retrospective 5-year study of 50 patients with early-stage HCC undergoing MWA with curative intent or liver resection. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the IMbrave050 criteria. The primary outcomes were RFS and overall survival (OS) in the high- and low-risk cohorts. Results: For patients who underwent liver resection, the 1-year RFS was 77.8% and 100% in high- and low-risk patients respectively (p = NS). In those who underwent MWA, the 1-year RFS was 89.5% in the high-risk cohort and 73.3% in the low-risk cohort (p = NS). OS at 1-year was 100% in all cohorts (p = NS). Conclusions: In this Western cohort receiving predominantly ablation as curative therapy the current high-risk criteria do not reliably distinguish between those with increased risk of early recurrence and those without. Criteria defining high-risk may need to be refined to better identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6020014
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HCC Recurrence After Curative Intent Treatment: The Need for New High-Risk Criteria in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy

James P. O’Beirne, Jonathan Langton, Andrew Sloss, Tehara Wickremeratne et al.
Livers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

HCC Recurrence After Curative Intent Treatment: The Need for New High-Risk Criteria in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy

James P. O’Beirne, Jonathan Langton, Andrew Sloss, Tehara Wickremeratne, Natalie Commins, Rohit Gupta, Roger Wilson, Brooke Gaggin
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: Adjuvant therapy after curative intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant unmet need. The IMbrave050 study demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with high-risk HCC receiving adjuvant atezolizumab and bevacizumab post-curative treatment compared to active surveillance. However, the IMbrave050 cohort was predominantly Asian, largely underwent surgical resection, and had chronic liver disease (CLD) mainly due to hepatitis B features that differ markedly from the Australian setting, where microwave ablation (MWA) is more common and hepatitis B-related CLD is less prevalent. Given these differences, this study aimed to explore the performance of the IMbrave050 risk criteria in an Australian population of patients with early-stage HCC undergoing curative treatment to determine if the criteria identified patients with a high risk of recurrence who may benefit from adjuvant treatment. Method: We performed a retrospective 5-year study of 50 patients with early-stage HCC undergoing MWA with curative intent or liver resection. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the IMbrave050 criteria. The primary outcomes were RFS and overall survival (OS) in the high- and low-risk cohorts. Results: For patients who underwent liver resection, the 1-year RFS was 77.8% and 100% in high- and low-risk patients respectively (p = NS). In those who underwent MWA, the 1-year RFS was 89.5% in the high-risk cohort and 73.3% in the low-risk cohort (p = NS). OS at 1-year was 100% in all cohorts (p = NS). Conclusions: In this Western cohort receiving predominantly ablation as curative therapy the current high-risk criteria do not reliably distinguish between those with increased risk of early recurrence and those without. Criteria defining high-risk may need to be refined to better identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy in this setting.

LiversVol. 6(2)
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.