EFFECT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION ON CARDIAC ELECTROMECHANICAL FUNCTIONS: ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION IN YOUNG HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

Introduction: The cardiac safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination has been questioned due to rare reports of vaccine-associated myocarditis, particularly in young individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination on electrocardiographic repolarization parameters and echocardiographic cardiac function in young healthy adults. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 200 healthy individuals aged 18–45 years. Participants who had received two or three doses of BNT162b2 at least two years prior to enrollment were assigned to the vaccinated group (n=112), while unvaccinated individuals constituted the control group (n=88). Standard 12-lead electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography were performed. Electrocardiographic repolarization indices and diastolic function parameters were compared between groups. Given the significant sex imbalance, sex-adjusted analyses were performed using analysis of covariance. Results: P-wave dispersion (46.2 ± 6.8 vs. 45.7 ± 7.1 ms, p=0.61), QT dispersion (38.4 ± 8.9 vs. 38.1 ± 9.3 ms, p=0.86), QTc dispersion (44.9 ± 10.3 vs. 46.8 ± 11.2 ms, p=0.27), and frontal QRS–T angle (33.6 ± 25.0 vs. 30.9 ± 12.2°, p=0.78) did not differ significantly between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. After adjustment for sex, vaccination status was not independently associated with P-wave dispersion (adjusted p=0.333) or QTc dispersion (adjusted p=0.559). Although lateral e′ velocity (13.20 ± 2.40 vs. 12.23 ± 1.57 cm/s, p=0.008) and deceleration time (203.9 ± 25.9 vs. 194.6 ± 17.9 ms, p=0.017) were higher in the vaccinated group, these differences remained within established physiological reference ranges. Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF: 64.3 ± 2.3% vs. 64.6 ± 2.5%, p=0.23) and other diastolic parameters were largely comparable between groups, with all values remaining within normal physiological reference ranges. Conclusions: In young healthy adults evaluated at least two years after vaccination, BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination was not associated with clinically meaningful long-term alterations in cardiac repolarization or diastolic function. These findings support the long-term cardiac safety of the vaccine in this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eskisehir Medical Journal Eskisehir City Hospital
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48176/esmj.2026.232
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION ON CARDIAC ELECTROMECHANICAL FUNCTIONS: ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION IN YOUNG HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

Şakir ARSLAN, Oğuz Kaan Kaya
Eskisehir Medical Journal Eskisehir City Hospital
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
article

EFFECT OF COVID-19 VACCINATION ON CARDIAC ELECTROMECHANICAL FUNCTIONS: ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION IN YOUNG HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS

Şakir ARSLAN, Oğuz Kaan Kaya
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The cardiac safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination has been questioned due to rare reports of vaccine-associated myocarditis, particularly in young individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination on electrocardiographic repolarization parameters and echocardiographic cardiac function in young healthy adults. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 200 healthy individuals aged 18–45 years. Participants who had received two or three doses of BNT162b2 at least two years prior to enrollment were assigned to the vaccinated group (n=112), while unvaccinated individuals constituted the control group (n=88). Standard 12-lead electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography were performed. Electrocardiographic repolarization indices and diastolic function parameters were compared between groups. Given the significant sex imbalance, sex-adjusted analyses were performed using analysis of covariance. Results: P-wave dispersion (46.2 ± 6.8 vs. 45.7 ± 7.1 ms, p=0.61), QT dispersion (38.4 ± 8.9 vs. 38.1 ± 9.3 ms, p=0.86), QTc dispersion (44.9 ± 10.3 vs. 46.8 ± 11.2 ms, p=0.27), and frontal QRS–T angle (33.6 ± 25.0 vs. 30.9 ± 12.2°, p=0.78) did not differ significantly between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. After adjustment for sex, vaccination status was not independently associated with P-wave dispersion (adjusted p=0.333) or QTc dispersion (adjusted p=0.559). Although lateral e′ velocity (13.20 ± 2.40 vs. 12.23 ± 1.57 cm/s, p=0.008) and deceleration time (203.9 ± 25.9 vs. 194.6 ± 17.9 ms, p=0.017) were higher in the vaccinated group, these differences remained within established physiological reference ranges. Left ventricular systolic function (LVEF: 64.3 ± 2.3% vs. 64.6 ± 2.5%, p=0.23) and other diastolic parameters were largely comparable between groups, with all values remaining within normal physiological reference ranges. Conclusions: In young healthy adults evaluated at least two years after vaccination, BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination was not associated with clinically meaningful long-term alterations in cardiac repolarization or diastolic function. These findings support the long-term cardiac safety of the vaccine in this population.

Eskisehir Medical Journal Eskisehir City Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.