Optimization of nanopore sequencing for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is emerging as a valuable tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, yet implementation in low-resource settings remains limited by prohibitory costs and infrastructure constraints. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers portable sequencing platforms that can overcome these barriers, but optimal workflows for bacterial WGS are not fully standardized. We evaluated the impact of multiplexing level (12-, 24-, and 36-plex) and input DNA amounts (50 ng, 100 ng, and 200 ng) on sequencing performance using ONT's Rapid Barcoding Kit v14 and R10.4.1 flow cells. Sequencing success was defined as assemblies with ≥30 × depth of coverage, complete MLST assignment, and full AMR gene detection. Across nine run configurations, sequencing success was highest for 12-plex runs (92-100% success) and 24-plex runs (79-82% success) when using ≤100 ng DNA input. 36-plex configurations and high DNA input markedly reduced performance (as low as 2.8% success). Lower DNA input (50 ng) did not compromise outcomes and mitigated negative effects of multiplexing. Cost analysis showed per-sample costs decreased with higher multiplexing, but excessive batching compromised data quality. These findings support practical ONT workflows for decentralized AMR surveillance, recommending ≤24 samples per flow cell and ≤100 ng DNA input to balance cost-effectiveness and sequencing success in low-resource laboratory settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1755877
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of nanopore sequencing for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings

René S. Hendriksen, Pernille Nilsson, Christa Twyford Gibson, Ana Rita Rebelo et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Optimization of nanopore sequencing for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings

René S. Hendriksen, Pernille Nilsson, Christa Twyford Gibson, Ana Rita Rebelo, Natasia Rebekka Thornval, Niamh Lacy-Roberts, Joana Mourão, Henrik Hasman
article en

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is emerging as a valuable tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, yet implementation in low-resource settings remains limited by prohibitory costs and infrastructure constraints. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers portable sequencing platforms that can overcome these barriers, but optimal workflows for bacterial WGS are not fully standardized. We evaluated the impact of multiplexing level (12-, 24-, and 36-plex) and input DNA amounts (50 ng, 100 ng, and 200 ng) on sequencing performance using ONT's Rapid Barcoding Kit v14 and R10.4.1 flow cells. Sequencing success was defined as assemblies with ≥30 × depth of coverage, complete MLST assignment, and full AMR gene detection. Across nine run configurations, sequencing success was highest for 12-plex runs (92-100% success) and 24-plex runs (79-82% success) when using ≤100 ng DNA input. 36-plex configurations and high DNA input markedly reduced performance (as low as 2.8% success). Lower DNA input (50 ng) did not compromise outcomes and mitigated negative effects of multiplexing. Cost analysis showed per-sample costs decreased with higher multiplexing, but excessive batching compromised data quality. These findings support practical ONT workflows for decentralized AMR surveillance, recommending ≤24 samples per flow cell and ≤100 ng DNA input to balance cost-effectiveness and sequencing success in low-resource laboratory settings.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Statens Serum Institut (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Department of Health and Social Care
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.