Critical Assessment of Current Standards for Wetting Deformation of Rockfill Materials Using the Discrete-Element Method

To study whether the triaxial specimen size suggested by the GB/T 50123-2019 and ASTM D7181-20 meets the representative element volume (REV) for the wetting deformation of rockfill materials, the effect of specimens with different ratios (Rd) of specimen diameter to the largest particle size on the wetting deformation of the basalt rockfill materials was analyzed by the discrete-element method (DEM). First, a wet deformation simulation method for rockfill materials was developed according to the wet deformation mechanism. The particle crushing simulation method, considering the strength dispersion and size effect, was introduced. Then, the DEM model parameters were determined by matching with the laboratory test, and the validity of the wetting simulation method was verified. Finally, triaxial wetting simulation tests under different conditions were conducted, and the reliability of wetting deformation obtained using specimen sizes suggested by the standard was analyzed. The results show that the wetting procedure of the rockfill materials can be reproduced by linearly transforming the DEM model parameters from the dry state to the saturated state. The wetting strains and their variation coefficients obtained using two specimen sizes with Rd = 5 and 6 have basically the same variation laws with confining pressures and wetting stress levels, but the values are different. When the criterion of variation coefficient is 5%, the triaxial specimen size (Rd = 6) of 360 mm in diameter and 720 mm in height can be adopted as the REV for the wetting axial strain and wetting volumetric strain, whereas the specimen size (Rd = 5) of 300 mm in diameter and 600 mm in height does not satisfy the requirement in the case of high wetting stress levels and high confining pressures. It is suggested that the diameter of the specimen adopted in the triaxial wetting test of rockfill materials not be less than six times the largest particle size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-12523
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Assessment of Current Standards for Wetting Deformation of Rockfill Materials Using the Discrete-Element Method

Shihao Yan, Guanhua Jia, Laixin Liang, Jia Yufeng et al.
International Journal of Geomechanics
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
article

Critical Assessment of Current Standards for Wetting Deformation of Rockfill Materials Using the Discrete-Element Method

Shihao Yan, Guanhua Jia, Laixin Liang, Jia Yufeng, X.X. Zhou, Shichun Chi, Jinwei Wang
article en

Abstract

To study whether the triaxial specimen size suggested by the GB/T 50123-2019 and ASTM D7181-20 meets the representative element volume (REV) for the wetting deformation of rockfill materials, the effect of specimens with different ratios (Rd) of specimen diameter to the largest particle size on the wetting deformation of the basalt rockfill materials was analyzed by the discrete-element method (DEM). First, a wet deformation simulation method for rockfill materials was developed according to the wet deformation mechanism. The particle crushing simulation method, considering the strength dispersion and size effect, was introduced. Then, the DEM model parameters were determined by matching with the laboratory test, and the validity of the wetting simulation method was verified. Finally, triaxial wetting simulation tests under different conditions were conducted, and the reliability of wetting deformation obtained using specimen sizes suggested by the standard was analyzed. The results show that the wetting procedure of the rockfill materials can be reproduced by linearly transforming the DEM model parameters from the dry state to the saturated state. The wetting strains and their variation coefficients obtained using two specimen sizes with Rd = 5 and 6 have basically the same variation laws with confining pressures and wetting stress levels, but the values are different. When the criterion of variation coefficient is 5%, the triaxial specimen size (Rd = 6) of 360 mm in diameter and 720 mm in height can be adopted as the REV for the wetting axial strain and wetting volumetric strain, whereas the specimen size (Rd = 5) of 300 mm in diameter and 600 mm in height does not satisfy the requirement in the case of high wetting stress levels and high confining pressures. It is suggested that the diameter of the specimen adopted in the triaxial wetting test of rockfill materials not be less than six times the largest particle size.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 26(5)
Hohai University (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Northwest University (US), North West Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.