Reply to the commentary on “Impact of time-to-surgery on survival and quality of life in oral cancer”

This letter responds to comments by Zhu et al. regarding the study on the impact of time-to-surgery on survival and quality of life in oral cancer. The authors clarify that the analyses reported were univariate Cox regressions, for which the commonly cited rule of ten events per variable does not apply, as it pertains mainly to multivariable models. They also reiterate that a multivariate analysis was intentionally not performed due to the limited number of disease-free survival events, to avoid model overfitting. Furthermore, they clarify that the COVID-19 pandemic could not have influenced the study results, since the patient cohort was treated between 2008 and 2015. Finally, the authors acknowledge the need for larger prospective studies to better define the relationship between surgical delay, survival, and quality of life in oral cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104801
Primary Topic
Oral health in cancer treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reply to the commentary on “Impact of time-to-surgery on survival and quality of life in oral cancer”

Margherita Tofanelli, Paolo Boscolo‐Rizzo, Giancarlo Tirelli
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Oral health in cancer treatment
article

Reply to the commentary on “Impact of time-to-surgery on survival and quality of life in oral cancer”

Margherita Tofanelli, Paolo Boscolo‐Rizzo, Giancarlo Tirelli
article en

Abstract

This letter responds to comments by Zhu et al. regarding the study on the impact of time-to-surgery on survival and quality of life in oral cancer. The authors clarify that the analyses reported were univariate Cox regressions, for which the commonly cited rule of ten events per variable does not apply, as it pertains mainly to multivariable models. They also reiterate that a multivariate analysis was intentionally not performed due to the limited number of disease-free survival events, to avoid model overfitting. Furthermore, they clarify that the COVID-19 pandemic could not have influenced the study results, since the patient cohort was treated between 2008 and 2015. Finally, the authors acknowledge the need for larger prospective studies to better define the relationship between surgical delay, survival, and quality of life in oral cancer.

American Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 47(2)
University of Trieste (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Oral health in cancer treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.