Adversity Quotient, Resilience and Professional Effectiveness among Helping Professionals

The Philippines faces a growing mental health crisis, yet counselors contend with limited resources, cultural stigma, and high occupational stress. Understanding factors that support counselor well-being and effectiveness is critical. This quantitative correlational study examined adversity quotient (AQ) and its relationship with resilience and professional effectiveness among 358 counselors recruited through convenience sampling from school settings in a Philippine province. Participants completed the Adversity Quotient Scale (AQ-12), the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), and a self-evaluation questionnaire measuring professional effectiveness. Results revealed high overall AQ, particularly in the dimensions of ownership and reach; very high resilience; and moderate self-evaluated professional effectiveness. No significant differences in any variable emerged across demographic profiles (sex, age, education, experience). Significant positive correlations were found between AQ and resilience (r = .766, p < .001) and between AQ and professional effectiveness (r = .657, p < .001). Regression analyses confirmed AQ as a significant predictor of both resilience (β = .766, p < .001) and professional effectiveness (β = .657, p < .001), explaining 58.7% and 43.2% of variance respectively. Findings suggest that counselors' capacity to manage adversity is strongly associated with their psychological resilience and perceived professional effectiveness. Implications for counselor training, institutional support, and professional development programs are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Behavioral and Social Analytics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65166/gwh4j269
Primary Topic
Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adversity Quotient, Resilience and Professional Effectiveness among Helping Professionals

Joan Kristel Adame
International Journal of Behavioral and Social Analytics
Psychological Treatments and Assessments
article

Adversity Quotient, Resilience and Professional Effectiveness among Helping Professionals

Joan Kristel Adame
article en

Abstract

The Philippines faces a growing mental health crisis, yet counselors contend with limited resources, cultural stigma, and high occupational stress. Understanding factors that support counselor well-being and effectiveness is critical. This quantitative correlational study examined adversity quotient (AQ) and its relationship with resilience and professional effectiveness among 358 counselors recruited through convenience sampling from school settings in a Philippine province. Participants completed the Adversity Quotient Scale (AQ-12), the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), and a self-evaluation questionnaire measuring professional effectiveness. Results revealed high overall AQ, particularly in the dimensions of ownership and reach; very high resilience; and moderate self-evaluated professional effectiveness. No significant differences in any variable emerged across demographic profiles (sex, age, education, experience). Significant positive correlations were found between AQ and resilience (r = .766, p < .001) and between AQ and professional effectiveness (r = .657, p < .001). Regression analyses confirmed AQ as a significant predictor of both resilience (β = .766, p < .001) and professional effectiveness (β = .657, p < .001), explaining 58.7% and 43.2% of variance respectively. Findings suggest that counselors' capacity to manage adversity is strongly associated with their psychological resilience and perceived professional effectiveness. Implications for counselor training, institutional support, and professional development programs are discussed.

International Journal of Behavioral and Social AnalyticsVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Psychological Treatments and Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.