Females exhibit greater cardiac volume reductions with expiratory muscle loading during submaximal exercise compared to males

Intrathoracic pressure (ITP) modulates venous return, ventricular filling and ejection throughout the respiratory cycle, and its fluctuations are accentuated during exercise. We sought to determine whether ITP manipulation during submaximal exercise alters cardiac volumes differently in males and females. Young, healthy participants completed two protocols (both n = 30, 15 females): (i) inspiratory loaded breathing (75 W and 30% W<sub>max</sub>) and (ii) expiratory loaded breathing (100 W and 60% W<sub>max</sub>). We aimed to increase the inspiratory and expiratory load by +20 cmH<sub>2</sub>O oesophageal pressure (absolute submaximal trials; 75 and 100 W) and +50% oesophageal pressure swings (relative submaximal trials; 30% and 60% W<sub>max</sub>). Intrathoracic pressure was measured with a balloon catheter placed in the oesophagus, and left ventricular volumes and cardiac output were determined via echocardiography. Inspiratory loading increased oesophageal pressure swings relative to spontaneous breathing at both intensities [75 W: +24.2 ± 10.2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +77.3%); 30% W<sub>max</sub>: +14.3 ± 8.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +53.1%); P < 0.0001] with no difference in stroke volume (SV) [75 W: +3.2 ± 10.1 mL (SV = +3.8%); 30% W<sub>max</sub>: +0.7 ± 9.7 mL (SV = +0.8%); P ≥ 0.100] in either sex. Expiratory loading increased oesophageal pressure swings relative to spontaneous breathing [100 W: +23.1 ± 4.1 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +66.3%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: +17.1 ± 8.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +50.1%); P < 0.0001]. With expiratory loading, SV decreased compared to spontaneous breathing [100 W: -11.4 ± 9.7 mL (SV = -13.8%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -8.3 ± 9.5 mL (SV = -10.2%); P < 0.0001] with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decreasing in females [100 W: -6.5 ± 4.7 mL (LVESV = -13.9%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -6.1 ± 6.5 mL (LVESV = -13.1%); both P < 0.0006], but not in males [100 W: -1.9 ± 7.2 mL (LVESV = -2.6%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -0.1 ± 4.8 mL (LVESV = -0.2%); P ≥ 0.409]. Overall, exercise appears to blunt any potential cardiac volume changes with inspiratory loaded breathing, whereas expiratory loaded breathing (less negative ITP) imposes a preload limitation that the exercising heart cannot compensate, thereby unmasking a female-specific reduction in LVESV. KEY POINTS: At rest, more negative intrathoracic pressure (ITP) with inspiratory loading lowers left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and stroke volume (SV). Previous work conducted at maximal exercise shows no cardiac volume changes with inspiratory loading. The mechanisms and any sex-based differences are unknown. During rest and exercise, less negative ITP with expiratory loading reduces LVEDV, SV and cardiac output; however, sex-specific responses remain unclear. Inspiratory loading at submaximal exercise results in no cardiac volume changes and responses were not different between males and females. Expiratory loading at submaximal exercise reduces LVEDV, SV and cardiac output in both sexes; however, females experience greater reductions in cardiac volumes and exhibit a decline in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). During exercise, potential cardiac volume changes associated with more negative ITP (inspiratory loading) appear to be masked by the cardiovascular responses to exercise, whereas less negative ITP (expiratory loading) imposes an uncompensated preload limitation although females attempt to counter this through LVESV reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physiology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/jp290476
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Females exhibit greater cardiac volume reductions with expiratory muscle loading during submaximal exercise compared to males

Michelle Mook, Jason S. Au, Sarah A. Angus, Paolo B. Dominelli et al.
The Journal of Physiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Females exhibit greater cardiac volume reductions with expiratory muscle loading during submaximal exercise compared to males

Michelle Mook, Jason S. Au, Sarah A. Angus, Paolo B. Dominelli, Benjamin P. Thompson, Connor J. Doherty, Eric J Stöhr
article en

Abstract

Intrathoracic pressure (ITP) modulates venous return, ventricular filling and ejection throughout the respiratory cycle, and its fluctuations are accentuated during exercise. We sought to determine whether ITP manipulation during submaximal exercise alters cardiac volumes differently in males and females. Young, healthy participants completed two protocols (both n = 30, 15 females): (i) inspiratory loaded breathing (75 W and 30% W<sub>max</sub>) and (ii) expiratory loaded breathing (100 W and 60% W<sub>max</sub>). We aimed to increase the inspiratory and expiratory load by +20 cmH<sub>2</sub>O oesophageal pressure (absolute submaximal trials; 75 and 100 W) and +50% oesophageal pressure swings (relative submaximal trials; 30% and 60% W<sub>max</sub>). Intrathoracic pressure was measured with a balloon catheter placed in the oesophagus, and left ventricular volumes and cardiac output were determined via echocardiography. Inspiratory loading increased oesophageal pressure swings relative to spontaneous breathing at both intensities [75 W: +24.2 ± 10.2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +77.3%); 30% W<sub>max</sub>: +14.3 ± 8.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +53.1%); P < 0.0001] with no difference in stroke volume (SV) [75 W: +3.2 ± 10.1 mL (SV = +3.8%); 30% W<sub>max</sub>: +0.7 ± 9.7 mL (SV = +0.8%); P ≥ 0.100] in either sex. Expiratory loading increased oesophageal pressure swings relative to spontaneous breathing [100 W: +23.1 ± 4.1 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +66.3%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: +17.1 ± 8.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (ITP = +50.1%); P < 0.0001]. With expiratory loading, SV decreased compared to spontaneous breathing [100 W: -11.4 ± 9.7 mL (SV = -13.8%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -8.3 ± 9.5 mL (SV = -10.2%); P < 0.0001] with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decreasing in females [100 W: -6.5 ± 4.7 mL (LVESV = -13.9%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -6.1 ± 6.5 mL (LVESV = -13.1%); both P < 0.0006], but not in males [100 W: -1.9 ± 7.2 mL (LVESV = -2.6%); 60% W<sub>max</sub>: -0.1 ± 4.8 mL (LVESV = -0.2%); P ≥ 0.409]. Overall, exercise appears to blunt any potential cardiac volume changes with inspiratory loaded breathing, whereas expiratory loaded breathing (less negative ITP) imposes a preload limitation that the exercising heart cannot compensate, thereby unmasking a female-specific reduction in LVESV. KEY POINTS: At rest, more negative intrathoracic pressure (ITP) with inspiratory loading lowers left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and stroke volume (SV). Previous work conducted at maximal exercise shows no cardiac volume changes with inspiratory loading. The mechanisms and any sex-based differences are unknown. During rest and exercise, less negative ITP with expiratory loading reduces LVEDV, SV and cardiac output; however, sex-specific responses remain unclear. Inspiratory loading at submaximal exercise results in no cardiac volume changes and responses were not different between males and females. Expiratory loading at submaximal exercise reduces LVEDV, SV and cardiac output in both sexes; however, females experience greater reductions in cardiac volumes and exhibit a decline in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). During exercise, potential cardiac volume changes associated with more negative ITP (inspiratory loading) appear to be masked by the cardiovascular responses to exercise, whereas less negative ITP (expiratory loading) imposes an uncompensated preload limitation although females attempt to counter this through LVESV reductions.

The Journal of Physiology
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.