CMB Evidence for Pre-Metric Physics: Operational Advantage from Extending Metric Physics

This paper reports an operational, morphology-sensitive cohort comparison on Planck PR3 CMB lensing reconstructions. The central empirical result is a strong and persistent separation from Gaussian power-matched controls in the diagnostics D1_L2 and Z_mf,, while the observed cohort remains comparatively close to ΛCDM reconstruction controls on the same diagnostics. Using topology-based controls and morphology-sensitive observables, the study identifies a reproducible cohort-separation pattern across tested multipole cutoffs. The claim is intentionally methodological rather than ontological: extending standard metric analysis with a morphology-sensitive (“pre-metric”) observable layer can recover discriminative structure that may remain underutilized in metric-only pipelines. The paper positions this as an operational advantage for analysis design, and as a framework extension compatible with standard metric physics rather than a replacement for it. Version 1.1 update:This version strengthens the paper’s operational claim by adding a morphology-space figure that makes the cohort structure visually explicit. In Planck PR3 CMB lensing, Gaussian synthetic controls matched to the same power spectrum remain clearly separated from the observed field in the primary morphology-sensitive diagnostics D1_L2 and Z_mf,, while ΛCDM reconstructions occupy the same morphology regime as the observed data. Version 1.1 also clarifies the robustness framing by stating that the pipeline was subjected to an explicit disconfirmation audit using power-matched Gaussian controls and ΛCDM reconstructions, with the morphology-space separation persisting across these tests. The core contribution remains methodological: standard metric summaries are retained, but extended with a complementary morphology-sensitive layer that improves discrimination between structured cosmological reconstructions and Gaussianized controls. Podcast: https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8b5533e5-d7b3-4c33-9bf9-79aaff2ed416?artifactId=59052952-bdca-4383-93f2-393778077f7c

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18759992
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CMB Evidence for Pre-Metric Physics: Operational Advantage from Extending Metric Physics

Marcus van der Erve, GPT-5.2 Thinking
Open MIND
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

CMB Evidence for Pre-Metric Physics: Operational Advantage from Extending Metric Physics

Marcus van der Erve, GPT-5.2 Thinking
article en

Abstract

This paper reports an operational, morphology-sensitive cohort comparison on Planck PR3 CMB lensing reconstructions. The central empirical result is a strong and persistent separation from Gaussian power-matched controls in the diagnostics D1_L2 and Z_mf,, while the observed cohort remains comparatively close to ΛCDM reconstruction controls on the same diagnostics. Using topology-based controls and morphology-sensitive observables, the study identifies a reproducible cohort-separation pattern across tested multipole cutoffs. The claim is intentionally methodological rather than ontological: extending standard metric analysis with a morphology-sensitive (“pre-metric”) observable layer can recover discriminative structure that may remain underutilized in metric-only pipelines. The paper positions this as an operational advantage for analysis design, and as a framework extension compatible with standard metric physics rather than a replacement for it. Version 1.1 update:This version strengthens the paper’s operational claim by adding a morphology-space figure that makes the cohort structure visually explicit. In Planck PR3 CMB lensing, Gaussian synthetic controls matched to the same power spectrum remain clearly separated from the observed field in the primary morphology-sensitive diagnostics D1_L2 and Z_mf,, while ΛCDM reconstructions occupy the same morphology regime as the observed data. Version 1.1 also clarifies the robustness framing by stating that the pipeline was subjected to an explicit disconfirmation audit using power-matched Gaussian controls and ΛCDM reconstructions, with the morphology-space separation persisting across these tests. The core contribution remains methodological: standard metric summaries are retained, but extended with a complementary morphology-sensitive layer that improves discrimination between structured cosmological reconstructions and Gaussianized controls. Podcast: https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/8b5533e5-d7b3-4c33-9bf9-79aaff2ed416?artifactId=59052952-bdca-4383-93f2-393778077f7c

Open MIND
RPX (United States) (US), OpenAI (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.