Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials

Although members of most stakeholder groups participating in Delphi surveys view involvement of an academic principal investigator with overall responsibility for a multicenter randomized controlled trial as very important, there are notable differences depending on the respondent's perspective, the specific trial-related task, and the source of funding for the trial. In addition, principal investigators generally view an academic principal investigator as more important to the validity of a publicly funded multicenter randomized controlled trial than to the that of an industry-funded trial. These findings highlight the need to clarify the real-world practices of clinical trial leadership across diverse settings and to assess how those practices align with widely shared norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Trials
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261417337
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials

Deborah E. Sellers, Elizabeth F. Bair, Eric G. Campbell, Cary P. Gross et al.
Clinical Trials
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials

Deborah E. Sellers, Elizabeth F. Bair, Eric G. Campbell, Cary P. Gross, Donna Chen, Katharine A. Gleason, Michelle M. Mello, Steven Joffe, Sarah A McGraw
article en

Abstract

Although members of most stakeholder groups participating in Delphi surveys view involvement of an academic principal investigator with overall responsibility for a multicenter randomized controlled trial as very important, there are notable differences depending on the respondent's perspective, the specific trial-related task, and the source of funding for the trial. In addition, principal investigators generally view an academic principal investigator as more important to the validity of a publicly funded multicenter randomized controlled trial than to the that of an industry-funded trial. These findings highlight the need to clarify the real-world practices of clinical trial leadership across diverse settings and to assess how those practices align with widely shared norms.

Clinical Trials
Hastings Center (US), Cornell University (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Media Working Group (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.