Self-Consistent Misalignment: Observability Constraints and Structural Consequences in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems

RT2 specifies self-consistent misalignment as a trajectory where task-relevant mismatch deepens while internal evaluation continues to report health and loses discriminating power. It separates this trajectory definition from mechanisms that might generate it. Conditional information and observation results identify distinct limits without proving inevitable observer loss or impossible autonomous correction. Version 3.0 proposes reference-displacement and response measurements that distinguish information, evaluation, updating, and recovery. Explicit mathematical examples and prospective comparisons replace unreproduced numerical demonstrations. Related literature supplies bounded examples, while framework-specific measurement gains, scaling relations, and correction-cost laws remain unvalidated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18761731
Primary Topic
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Self-Consistent Misalignment: Observability Constraints and Structural Consequences in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems

Bin Seol
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
article

Self-Consistent Misalignment: Observability Constraints and Structural Consequences in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems

Bin Seol
article en

Abstract

RT2 specifies self-consistent misalignment as a trajectory where task-relevant mismatch deepens while internal evaluation continues to report health and loses discriminating power. It separates this trajectory definition from mechanisms that might generate it. Conditional information and observation results identify distinct limits without proving inevitable observer loss or impossible autonomous correction. Version 3.0 proposes reference-displacement and response measurements that distinguish information, evaluation, updating, and recovery. Explicit mathematical examples and prospective comparisons replace unreproduced numerical demonstrations. Related literature supplies bounded examples, while framework-specific measurement gains, scaling relations, and correction-cost laws remain unvalidated.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.