When silence backfires: crisis response sincerity, perceived severity, and brand avoidance in hospitality greenwashing crises

Purpose Greenwashing accusations are rising in hospitality, yet organizations often rely on misleading crisis communication. Drawing on Situational Crisis Communication Theory, the purpose of this study is to examine how misleading greenwashing crisis communication influences consumer brand avoidance. This study further examines the impact of perceived response sincerity and brand trust as sequential mediators and perceived crisis severity as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Two scenario-based online experimental studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. Analysis of variance and PROCESS macro were used to assess direct, indirect and moderated mediation effects. Findings The results of this study indicate that misleading crisis communication significantly increases consumer brand avoidance, with omission being more damaging than paltering in shaping negative consumer responses. Perceived crisis severity functions as a moderator in the indirect pathway linking misleading communication to brand avoidance, with the difference in impact between omission and paltering emerging only when lower levels of crisis severity are perceived. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study underscore the value of integrating misleading tactics and sincerity-based pathways into Situational Crisis Communication Theory in greenwashing crises. Practical implications Hospitality firms should avoid omission, communicate transparently and gauge perceived severity early, as sincerity and trust restoration are crucial for reducing brand avoidance. Originality/value This research contributes to the greenwashing and crisis management research by focusing on crisis response strategies rather than prevention. This study contributes to the hospitality field by providing empirical evidence on how misleading communication impacts consumer behavior. The findings also offer practical insights for businesses to effectively manage greenwashing crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2025-0589
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When silence backfires: crisis response sincerity, perceived severity, and brand avoidance in hospitality greenwashing crises

Ki-Joon Back, Juan M. Madera, Anni Ding, Tiffany S. Legendre et al.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

When silence backfires: crisis response sincerity, perceived severity, and brand avoidance in hospitality greenwashing crises

Ki-Joon Back, Juan M. Madera, Anni Ding, Tiffany S. Legendre, Yan Huang
article en

Abstract

Purpose Greenwashing accusations are rising in hospitality, yet organizations often rely on misleading crisis communication. Drawing on Situational Crisis Communication Theory, the purpose of this study is to examine how misleading greenwashing crisis communication influences consumer brand avoidance. This study further examines the impact of perceived response sincerity and brand trust as sequential mediators and perceived crisis severity as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Two scenario-based online experimental studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. Analysis of variance and PROCESS macro were used to assess direct, indirect and moderated mediation effects. Findings The results of this study indicate that misleading crisis communication significantly increases consumer brand avoidance, with omission being more damaging than paltering in shaping negative consumer responses. Perceived crisis severity functions as a moderator in the indirect pathway linking misleading communication to brand avoidance, with the difference in impact between omission and paltering emerging only when lower levels of crisis severity are perceived. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study underscore the value of integrating misleading tactics and sincerity-based pathways into Situational Crisis Communication Theory in greenwashing crises. Practical implications Hospitality firms should avoid omission, communicate transparently and gauge perceived severity early, as sincerity and trust restoration are crucial for reducing brand avoidance. Originality/value This research contributes to the greenwashing and crisis management research by focusing on crisis response strategies rather than prevention. This study contributes to the hospitality field by providing empirical evidence on how misleading communication impacts consumer behavior. The findings also offer practical insights for businesses to effectively manage greenwashing crises.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality ManagementVol. 38(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Houston (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.