Better Policymaking in the Age of AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how governments design and deliver policy. AI tools such as predictive models, generative AI, and emerging agentic systems offer opportunities to broaden participation, improve efficiency, and strengthen evidence use. At the same time, they raise significant risks for fairness, accountability, and sustainability. This paper examines how AI is shaping policymaking across the four main stages of the democratic policy cycle. Drawing on relevant research and empirical examples, we discuss how, in the agenda-setting phase, AI can support citizen deliberation and manage large-scale public input, but risks excluding underrepresented groups or being misused for public opinion manipulation. In policy formulation, AI can help simulate impacts and draft legislation, while also introducing dangers of bias, hallucinations, and loss of accountability. In policy implementation, AI can streamline administration and personalize services, yet may deepen divides and cloud institutional accountability. In policy evaluation, AI can accelerate analyses and stakeholder input, but automation bias and opacity threaten reliability. Beyond stage-specific risks, governments must also address broader concerns of workforce deskilling, dependence on dominant vendors, and the environmental costs of large-scale AI infrastructures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better Policymaking in the Age of AI

Rony Medaglia
CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Better Policymaking in the Age of AI

Rony Medaglia
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how governments design and deliver policy. AI tools such as predictive models, generative AI, and emerging agentic systems offer opportunities to broaden participation, improve efficiency, and strengthen evidence use. At the same time, they raise significant risks for fairness, accountability, and sustainability. This paper examines how AI is shaping policymaking across the four main stages of the democratic policy cycle. Drawing on relevant research and empirical examples, we discuss how, in the agenda-setting phase, AI can support citizen deliberation and manage large-scale public input, but risks excluding underrepresented groups or being misused for public opinion manipulation. In policy formulation, AI can help simulate impacts and draft legislation, while also introducing dangers of bias, hallucinations, and loss of accountability. In policy implementation, AI can streamline administration and personalize services, yet may deepen divides and cloud institutional accountability. In policy evaluation, AI can accelerate analyses and stakeholder input, but automation bias and opacity threaten reliability. Beyond stage-specific risks, governments must also address broader concerns of workforce deskilling, dependence on dominant vendors, and the environmental costs of large-scale AI infrastructures.

CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.