Relativní totalita jako zdroj diference v Schellingově filosofii identity

The article offers a reconstruction of Schelling’s concept of relative totality within the framework of his philosophy of identity, with a particular focus on its role as a source of difference. Relative totality is presented as a key structural element of Schelling’s system, enabling the articulation of difference within absolute identity. The analysis shows that the being as well as the form of absolute identity remain intact, while quantitative differences allow for the emergence of relative totalities that introduce a formal – though not real – differentiation between individuals and the whole. Whereas in his Presentation of My System of Philosophy (1801), Schelling considers the possibility of methodologically positing something beyond absolute identity, in Philosophy and Religion (1804) he develops this notion further through the concept of a fall from the absolute into actual non-being. The development of Schelling’s philosophy of identity thus reveals a tension between formal and ontological difference, raising the question of the possibility of real difference within a system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REFLEXE
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2026.2
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relativní totalita jako zdroj diference v Schellingově filosofii identity

Jan Thümmel
REFLEXE
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

Relativní totalita jako zdroj diference v Schellingově filosofii identity

Jan Thümmel
article en

Abstract

The article offers a reconstruction of Schelling’s concept of relative totality within the framework of his philosophy of identity, with a particular focus on its role as a source of difference. Relative totality is presented as a key structural element of Schelling’s system, enabling the articulation of difference within absolute identity. The analysis shows that the being as well as the form of absolute identity remain intact, while quantitative differences allow for the emergence of relative totalities that introduce a formal – though not real – differentiation between individuals and the whole. Whereas in his Presentation of My System of Philosophy (1801), Schelling considers the possibility of methodologically positing something beyond absolute identity, in Philosophy and Religion (1804) he develops this notion further through the concept of a fall from the absolute into actual non-being. The development of Schelling’s philosophy of identity thus reveals a tension between formal and ontological difference, raising the question of the possibility of real difference within a system.

REFLEXEVol. 2025(69)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.