Pre‐analytical optimization of cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> and extracellular vesicle‐derived <scp>DNA</scp> for mutation detection in liquid biopsies

Liquid biopsies enable noninvasive tumor profiling and longitudinal disease monitoring. Their analytical performance is strongly influenced by pre-analytical factors, yet direct comparisons between cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicle-derived DNA (evDNA) remain scarce. We prospectively evaluated four pre-analytical variables: processing delay, storage temperature, tube type, and plasma input volume, on cfDNA and evDNA from cancer patient plasma (n = 244) using ddPCR, Qubit, and TapeStation. Key findings were validated in archived plasma samples (n = 723). In the prospective cohort, cfDNA concentrations increased after 24 h and evDNA after 48 h at room temperature, while retrospective analysis revealed earlier changes (cfDNA: 6 h; evDNA: 24 h). Storage conditions influenced both analytes, as short-term refrigeration (4 °C) better preserved DNA quality than -80 °C freezing, while extracted DNA remained stable at -80 °C. Acid citrate dextrose (ACD) and K<sub>2</sub>EDTA tubes performed similarly under prompt processing. Higher plasma volumes improved evDNA, but not cfDNA, for mutation detection. evDNA demonstrates greater resilience than cfDNA under suboptimal conditions. Standardized workflows and prompt processing are essential to ensure reliable mutation detection in clinical liquid biopsy applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oncology
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70222
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre‐analytical optimization of cell‐free DNA and extracellular vesicle‐derived DNA for mutation detection in liquid biopsies

Bret M. Stephens, Jonas Dohmen, J. Kalff, Alexander Semaan et al.
Molecular Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Pre‐analytical optimization of cell‐free DNA and extracellular vesicle‐derived DNA for mutation detection in liquid biopsies

Bret M. Stephens, Jonas Dohmen, J. Kalff, Alexander Semaan, Paola Guerrero, A. Maitra, Lara Braun, Daniel Weissinger, Vincent P Bernard, L De Santis, Johannes Röttgen, Phillipp Leyendecker
article en

Abstract

Liquid biopsies enable noninvasive tumor profiling and longitudinal disease monitoring. Their analytical performance is strongly influenced by pre-analytical factors, yet direct comparisons between cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicle-derived DNA (evDNA) remain scarce. We prospectively evaluated four pre-analytical variables: processing delay, storage temperature, tube type, and plasma input volume, on cfDNA and evDNA from cancer patient plasma (n = 244) using ddPCR, Qubit, and TapeStation. Key findings were validated in archived plasma samples (n = 723). In the prospective cohort, cfDNA concentrations increased after 24 h and evDNA after 48 h at room temperature, while retrospective analysis revealed earlier changes (cfDNA: 6 h; evDNA: 24 h). Storage conditions influenced both analytes, as short-term refrigeration (4 °C) better preserved DNA quality than -80 °C freezing, while extracted DNA remained stable at -80 °C. Acid citrate dextrose (ACD) and K<sub>2</sub>EDTA tubes performed similarly under prompt processing. Higher plasma volumes improved evDNA, but not cfDNA, for mutation detection. evDNA demonstrates greater resilience than cfDNA under suboptimal conditions. Standardized workflows and prompt processing are essential to ensure reliable mutation detection in clinical liquid biopsy applications.

Molecular Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Bonn (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Break Through Cancer, Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Foundation, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.