LIVER RESECTION VERSUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR EARLY-STAGE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: AN EVIDENCE-BASED NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT SELECTION

Background: Surgical resection (LR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are established curative options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet their relative benefits remain debated, particularly regarding long-term survival, recurrence control, and patient selection. Objectives: To synthesize contemporary evidence comparing liver resection and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC, with a focus on oncological outcomes, recurrence patterns, perioperative safety, and clinically relevant subgroups. Methods: An evidence-based narrative review was conducted using structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and high-quality observational studies comparing LR and RFA in early-stage HCC were included. Outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), recurrence-free or disease-free survival (RFS/DFS), tumor recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. Findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Randomized controlled trials consistently demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall survival between LR and RFA. In contrast, meta-analyses and propensity-adjusted observational studies suggested improved long-term survival following resection in selected patients with preserved liver function. Across comparative studies, recurrence-free survival and local tumor control consistently favored resection. Subgroup analyses indicated comparable survival outcomes between modalities in patients with very small tumors, impaired hepatic reserve (Child–Pugh class B), and elderly populations, while tumor size and anatomical location emerged as key modifiers of treatment efficacy. Conclusions: Liver resection provides superior local tumor control, whereas overall survival remains largely comparable between modalities in carefully selected patients. Treatment selection should be individualized, integrating tumor characteristics, liver function, patient comorbidities, and procedural risk within a multidisciplinary framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4779
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LIVER RESECTION VERSUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR EARLY-STAGE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: AN EVIDENCE-BASED NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT SELECTION

Małgorzata Dmochowska, Julia Hertmanowska, Adrianna Alicja Piekarska, Gabriela Kryger et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

LIVER RESECTION VERSUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR EARLY-STAGE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: AN EVIDENCE-BASED NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT SELECTION

Małgorzata Dmochowska, Julia Hertmanowska, Adrianna Alicja Piekarska, Gabriela Kryger, Zuzanna Karolina Jędrzejczak, Paweł Jan Babiński, Andrzej Józef Horabik, Krzysztof Chmura, Marta Piotrowska, Magdalena Wiśniewska
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection (LR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are established curative options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet their relative benefits remain debated, particularly regarding long-term survival, recurrence control, and patient selection. Objectives: To synthesize contemporary evidence comparing liver resection and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage HCC, with a focus on oncological outcomes, recurrence patterns, perioperative safety, and clinically relevant subgroups. Methods: An evidence-based narrative review was conducted using structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and high-quality observational studies comparing LR and RFA in early-stage HCC were included. Outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), recurrence-free or disease-free survival (RFS/DFS), tumor recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. Findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Randomized controlled trials consistently demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall survival between LR and RFA. In contrast, meta-analyses and propensity-adjusted observational studies suggested improved long-term survival following resection in selected patients with preserved liver function. Across comparative studies, recurrence-free survival and local tumor control consistently favored resection. Subgroup analyses indicated comparable survival outcomes between modalities in patients with very small tumors, impaired hepatic reserve (Child–Pugh class B), and elderly populations, while tumor size and anatomical location emerged as key modifiers of treatment efficacy. Conclusions: Liver resection provides superior local tumor control, whereas overall survival remains largely comparable between modalities in carefully selected patients. Treatment selection should be individualized, integrating tumor characteristics, liver function, patient comorbidities, and procedural risk within a multidisciplinary framework.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science(1(49))
St Vincent Hospital (US), Gdynia Maritime University (PL), University Clinical Centre (PL), Szpital Morski im. PCK
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.