Stane se umělá inteligence nástrojem harmonizace správního práva procesního v Evropě?

In November 2024, a proposal for a new Article 15a of the Code of Administrative Proceedings was submitted by a group of deputies in the Chamber of Representatives of the Czech Parliament. The proposed article aimed to introduce the possibility of automated decision-making into the administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. This article argues that this proposal did not represent an isolated effort by Czech legislators. On the contrary, the proposal was a part of a much broader pan-European tendency to adopt legal rules, enabling the substitution of official work (i.e., human beings) by decisions made by artificial intelligence. The advent of artificial intelligence is a phenomenon that is not tied to a specific jurisdiction but has a transnational character. In this context, this article posits that the transnational character of artificial intelligence can become a tool for the harmonisation of administrative procedural law in Europe in the future. In this respect, this article addresses current developments in this field under both the Council of Europe and selected national legal systems (Spain, Germany, Estonia). The article also highlights the role of legal academics (the so-called Professorenrecht) in establishing the emerging legal framework for the automation of decision-making in administrative law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2026.2
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stane se umělá inteligence nástrojem harmonizace správního práva procesního v Evropě?

Jakub Handrlica
AUC IURIDICA
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Stane se umělá inteligence nástrojem harmonizace správního práva procesního v Evropě?

Jakub Handrlica
article en

Abstract

In November 2024, a proposal for a new Article 15a of the Code of Administrative Proceedings was submitted by a group of deputies in the Chamber of Representatives of the Czech Parliament. The proposed article aimed to introduce the possibility of automated decision-making into the administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. This article argues that this proposal did not represent an isolated effort by Czech legislators. On the contrary, the proposal was a part of a much broader pan-European tendency to adopt legal rules, enabling the substitution of official work (i.e., human beings) by decisions made by artificial intelligence. The advent of artificial intelligence is a phenomenon that is not tied to a specific jurisdiction but has a transnational character. In this context, this article posits that the transnational character of artificial intelligence can become a tool for the harmonisation of administrative procedural law in Europe in the future. In this respect, this article addresses current developments in this field under both the Council of Europe and selected national legal systems (Spain, Germany, Estonia). The article also highlights the role of legal academics (the so-called Professorenrecht) in establishing the emerging legal framework for the automation of decision-making in administrative law.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 72(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.