Validation of Skill-Assessment Software for NOAA NOS Operational Oceanographic Modeling Systems

The National Ocean Service (NOS) currently validates Operational Forecast System (OFS) model output against real-time observations using a standardized Fortran-based skill-assessment package that computes accuracy and error metrics. The NOS Shared Cyber-Infrastructure and Skill Assessment (SCI-SA) project aims to develop a next generation Python-based system, delivering the same statistics from a simpler user interface with expanded and enhanced features. This study applied both systems to Chesapeake Bay OFS output from January to June, 2024. Observations and matching model series for water level, currents, water temperature, and salinity were extracted for nowcast and forecast runs, and identically processed in accordance with the standard operating procedures for NOS skill assessments. Each package produced a comprehensive record at every station for the specified variable and run type, containing bias, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation, central and outlier frequencies, error-duration metrics, and related statistics. These paired records were directly compared and rigorously tested for statistical equivalence. Visual data analysis exposed two discrepancies for all variables: a time series offset when station files were missing and a fixed vertical offset caused by model ingestion techniques. After correcting these issues and matching preprocessing settings, graphical differences diminished and every station, variable, and run type returned statistically similar skill assessment scores. This experiment confirms that the Python workflow reproduces legacy results with full fidelity while offering a cleaner user interface and straightforward output. This validation framework provides a foundation for future NOS skill-assessment comparisons and advances our ability to deliver modern, continuously evaluated coastal ocean forecasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18750121
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Skill-Assessment Software for NOAA NOS Operational Oceanographic Modeling Systems

Lucila J. Houttuijn Bloemendaal, C. Lindley, Luke W. Judd, Aijun Zjang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

Validation of Skill-Assessment Software for NOAA NOS Operational Oceanographic Modeling Systems

Lucila J. Houttuijn Bloemendaal, C. Lindley, Luke W. Judd, Aijun Zjang
article en

Abstract

The National Ocean Service (NOS) currently validates Operational Forecast System (OFS) model output against real-time observations using a standardized Fortran-based skill-assessment package that computes accuracy and error metrics. The NOS Shared Cyber-Infrastructure and Skill Assessment (SCI-SA) project aims to develop a next generation Python-based system, delivering the same statistics from a simpler user interface with expanded and enhanced features. This study applied both systems to Chesapeake Bay OFS output from January to June, 2024. Observations and matching model series for water level, currents, water temperature, and salinity were extracted for nowcast and forecast runs, and identically processed in accordance with the standard operating procedures for NOS skill assessments. Each package produced a comprehensive record at every station for the specified variable and run type, containing bias, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation, central and outlier frequencies, error-duration metrics, and related statistics. These paired records were directly compared and rigorously tested for statistical equivalence. Visual data analysis exposed two discrepancies for all variables: a time series offset when station files were missing and a fixed vertical offset caused by model ingestion techniques. After correcting these issues and matching preprocessing settings, graphical differences diminished and every station, variable, and run type returned statistically similar skill assessment scores. This experiment confirms that the Python workflow reproduces legacy results with full fidelity while offering a cleaner user interface and straightforward output. This validation framework provides a foundation for future NOS skill-assessment comparisons and advances our ability to deliver modern, continuously evaluated coastal ocean forecasts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
NOAA National Ocean Service (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.