Využití systémů umělé inteligence při výkonu působnosti v oblasti veřejné správy, zejména perspektivou základních zásad činnosti správních orgánů a procesních práv jednotlivce

This paper focuses on identifying legal objections and risks associated with the introduction and use of AI systems in the exercise of public administration (PA) directed at individuals. It is specifically in the exercise of authoritative power over individuals that procedural rights become relevant. Therefore, the use of AI in PA activities that do not involve the exercise of superior authority or are not targeted at individuals (such as internal organizational functions or non-authoritative planning activities) falls outside the scope of this analysis. The author examines how the principle of legality in public authority may evolve in light of AI decision-making within PA. In this context, the paper explores whether the use of AI in decision-making by independent administrative authorities and collegial administrative bodies is legally permissible. Additionally, it considers the implications of AI use in relation to the principle of “equal treatment in similar cases”, the right to a reasoned decision, and the right to have a decision reviewed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2026.6
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Využití systémů umělé inteligence při výkonu působnosti v oblasti veřejné správy, zejména perspektivou základních zásad činnosti správních orgánů a procesních práv jednotlivce

Olga Pouperová
AUC IURIDICA
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Využití systémů umělé inteligence při výkonu působnosti v oblasti veřejné správy, zejména perspektivou základních zásad činnosti správních orgánů a procesních práv jednotlivce

Olga Pouperová
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on identifying legal objections and risks associated with the introduction and use of AI systems in the exercise of public administration (PA) directed at individuals. It is specifically in the exercise of authoritative power over individuals that procedural rights become relevant. Therefore, the use of AI in PA activities that do not involve the exercise of superior authority or are not targeted at individuals (such as internal organizational functions or non-authoritative planning activities) falls outside the scope of this analysis. The author examines how the principle of legality in public authority may evolve in light of AI decision-making within PA. In this context, the paper explores whether the use of AI in decision-making by independent administrative authorities and collegial administrative bodies is legally permissible. Additionally, it considers the implications of AI use in relation to the principle of “equal treatment in similar cases”, the right to a reasoned decision, and the right to have a decision reviewed.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 72(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.