Developing a practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care: a Global Initiative to Advance Cancer Navigation for Better Outcomes (GINO) project

Patient navigation comprises person-centred activities focused on addressing barriers and facilitating timely access to health care. Despite demonstrated effectiveness, the scope of patient navigation remains unclear. To clarify the scope of patient navigation and support global implementation, the Global Initiative to Advance Cancer Navigation for Better Outcomes (GINO) aimed to develop a practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care. Phase 1 involved reviewing patient navigation literature and identifying key areas of practice. Phase 2 involved a modified Delphi process with international experts in navigation (July to December 2024) to establish consensus on practices to include in the framework. Patient navigation experts across regions and disciplines were invited. Two rounds of online surveys were conducted where participants rated the importance of each practice on a scale from 1 ("Not important") to 5 ("Critically important"). Practices rated ≥4 by ≥ 75% of participants in Round 2 met consensus criteria. The remaining items were discussed in a consensus meeting. Eighty-one experts from 29 countries (n = 45, 56% high-income, n = 36, 44% low-middle-income) participated in Round 1. Of these, 60 also participated in Round 2, including healthcare practitioners (n = 30, 50%), navigators (n = 16, 27%), researchers (n = 24, 40%), and advocates (n = 10, 17%). After Round 2, 27/35 (77%) practices reached consensus for inclusion. After the consensus meeting, two items were reworded, and 32 items were included in the final framework. We reached consensus among international experts on the contents of the GINO practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care. By describing the scope of patient navigation, the framework can support the development and implementation of patient navigation programs globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EClinicalMedicine
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103808
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care: a Global Initiative to Advance Cancer Navigation for Better Outcomes (GINO) project

Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Carla Thamm, Ria Joseph, Stefano Magno et al.
1 citations
EClinicalMedicine
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
24.20
article

Developing a practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care: a Global Initiative to Advance Cancer Navigation for Better Outcomes (GINO) project

Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Carla Thamm, Ria Joseph, Stefano Magno, Dagmara Poprawski, Niharika Dixit, Imogen Ramsey, Debbie Kirk, Michael Jefford, Jacqueline L. Bender, Melissa Chin, Dawn Aubel, Carolyn Ee, Fiona M. Crawford-Williams, Yin Ting Cheung, Darcy Burbage, Aalaa Mahmoud Ahmed Shawqi Mahmoud, Ebele Mbanugo, Emad Shash, Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Duška Petranović, Muna Alkhaifi, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Kristen Haase, Andreai Capela, Alexandre Chan, Nicolas H. Hart, Darren Haywood, Margaret I. Fitch, Sandra Sonego, Raymond J. Chan, Carolyn Taylor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patient navigation comprises person-centred activities focused on addressing barriers and facilitating timely access to health care. Despite demonstrated effectiveness, the scope of patient navigation remains unclear. To clarify the scope of patient navigation and support global implementation, the Global Initiative to Advance Cancer Navigation for Better Outcomes (GINO) aimed to develop a practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care. Phase 1 involved reviewing patient navigation literature and identifying key areas of practice. Phase 2 involved a modified Delphi process with international experts in navigation (July to December 2024) to establish consensus on practices to include in the framework. Patient navigation experts across regions and disciplines were invited. Two rounds of online surveys were conducted where participants rated the importance of each practice on a scale from 1 ("Not important") to 5 ("Critically important"). Practices rated ≥4 by ≥ 75% of participants in Round 2 met consensus criteria. The remaining items were discussed in a consensus meeting. Eighty-one experts from 29 countries (n = 45, 56% high-income, n = 36, 44% low-middle-income) participated in Round 1. Of these, 60 also participated in Round 2, including healthcare practitioners (n = 30, 50%), navigators (n = 16, 27%), researchers (n = 24, 40%), and advocates (n = 10, 17%). After Round 2, 27/35 (77%) practices reached consensus for inclusion. After the consensus meeting, two items were reworded, and 32 items were included in the final framework. We reached consensus among international experts on the contents of the GINO practice framework for patient navigation in cancer care. By describing the scope of patient navigation, the framework can support the development and implementation of patient navigation programs globally.

EClinicalMedicineVol. 93
Lagos State University (NG), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of California, Irvine (US), Cancer Care Ontario (CA), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US), Lagos State Health Service Commission (NG), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.