A Network of Actions – Evaluating False Recall and Recognition of Objects After Studying Affordances

<b></b> Presenting participants with lists of related words (e.g., climb, rock, slope, hike) often elicits false recall and recognition for a related but nonstudied critical lure (CL; <i>mountain</i>). This false memory illusion is often ascribed to the strong associative and/or thematic relations between the related list words and the CL. In the present study, we further evaluated this false memory effect by presenting participants with a list of affordances (e.g., arrange, pick, smell) that were related to a specific object CL (e.g., <i>flower</i>) via a normed database. Affordances refer to specific actions that can be completed with a given object, and the presentation of these actions may result in a false memory for a CL. Each study list was followed by either a free-recall test or a filler arithmetic task and a final recognition test. False memory for the CL was found both in the initial recall test and the final recognition test and was greater following an initial recall test. These data indicate that affordances can produce false memories for related objects which is particularly notable given affordances are verbs and CLs are nouns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000656
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Network of Actions – Evaluating False Recall and Recognition of Objects After Studying Affordances

Mark J. Huff, Alexa E. Tringali, Amelia G. Morehead
Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
Memory Processes and Influences
article

A Network of Actions – Evaluating False Recall and Recognition of Objects After Studying Affordances

Mark J. Huff, Alexa E. Tringali, Amelia G. Morehead
article en

Abstract

<b></b> Presenting participants with lists of related words (e.g., climb, rock, slope, hike) often elicits false recall and recognition for a related but nonstudied critical lure (CL; <i>mountain</i>). This false memory illusion is often ascribed to the strong associative and/or thematic relations between the related list words and the CL. In the present study, we further evaluated this false memory effect by presenting participants with a list of affordances (e.g., arrange, pick, smell) that were related to a specific object CL (e.g., <i>flower</i>) via a normed database. Affordances refer to specific actions that can be completed with a given object, and the presentation of these actions may result in a false memory for a CL. Each study list was followed by either a free-recall test or a filler arithmetic task and a final recognition test. False memory for the CL was found both in the initial recall test and the final recognition test and was greater following an initial recall test. These data indicate that affordances can produce false memories for related objects which is particularly notable given affordances are verbs and CLs are nouns.

Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)Vol. 72(5)
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.