Life Cycle Assessment of Low-Cost Membrane Bioreactor and Activated Sludge Systems for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Arid Regions

Small communities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) without a sewerage system commonly rely on septic tanks and long-distance transport of wastewater to the nearest centralized treatment facilities, resulting in high operational costs, social nuisance, and limited opportunities for treated effluent reuse. For a small community of 1300 persons in Al Qaraa (Qassim, KSA), this study performs life cycle analysis (LCA) to evaluate the environmental sustainability of a low-cost membrane bioreactor (LC-MBR)-type for decentralized on-site treatment as an alternative to wastewater transportation to a conventional extended aeration activated sludge process (EA-ASP)-type centralized system operating in the nearest larger city of Al-Bukayriyah. SimaPro<sup>®</sup> 8.3.0.0 with the ecoinvent 3.0 database and ReCiPe 16 midpoint methodology shows that the decentralized LC-MBR scenario outperformed the centralized option with a 49 km-long wastewater transportation route in 13 out of 15 selected midpoint categories when considering relative and normalized impacts. In the EA-ASP, primary treatment dominated environmental impacts across most categories, driven by high energy demand for wastewater pumping, whereas freshwater and marine eutrophication were primarily influenced by treatment efficiency. With smaller normalized values, secondary treatment had a greater relative impact on urban and agricultural land occupation categories, attributed to the use of clay and rice bran in low-cost membrane fabrication in an LC-MBR. Tertiary treatment in the LC-MBR scenario, incorporating coagulation and granular activated carbon, significantly reduced freshwater eutrophication. Although normalized endpoint impacts indicated comparable ecosystem impacts for both systems, the LC-MBR resulted in 8% lower impacts on human health and 60% lower on resource depletion. Overall, the findings support decentralized wastewater treatment as a sustainable solution for small communities in arid regions and provide valuable insights for policy and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Membranes
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16020074
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Low-Cost Membrane Bioreactor and Activated Sludge Systems for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Arid Regions

Husnain Haider, Saleem Saleh AlSaleem, Abdul Razzaq Ghumman, Md. Shafiquzzaman
Membranes
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Low-Cost Membrane Bioreactor and Activated Sludge Systems for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Arid Regions

Husnain Haider, Saleem Saleh AlSaleem, Abdul Razzaq Ghumman, Md. Shafiquzzaman
article en

Abstract

Small communities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) without a sewerage system commonly rely on septic tanks and long-distance transport of wastewater to the nearest centralized treatment facilities, resulting in high operational costs, social nuisance, and limited opportunities for treated effluent reuse. For a small community of 1300 persons in Al Qaraa (Qassim, KSA), this study performs life cycle analysis (LCA) to evaluate the environmental sustainability of a low-cost membrane bioreactor (LC-MBR)-type for decentralized on-site treatment as an alternative to wastewater transportation to a conventional extended aeration activated sludge process (EA-ASP)-type centralized system operating in the nearest larger city of Al-Bukayriyah. SimaPro<sup>®</sup> 8.3.0.0 with the ecoinvent 3.0 database and ReCiPe 16 midpoint methodology shows that the decentralized LC-MBR scenario outperformed the centralized option with a 49 km-long wastewater transportation route in 13 out of 15 selected midpoint categories when considering relative and normalized impacts. In the EA-ASP, primary treatment dominated environmental impacts across most categories, driven by high energy demand for wastewater pumping, whereas freshwater and marine eutrophication were primarily influenced by treatment efficiency. With smaller normalized values, secondary treatment had a greater relative impact on urban and agricultural land occupation categories, attributed to the use of clay and rice bran in low-cost membrane fabrication in an LC-MBR. Tertiary treatment in the LC-MBR scenario, incorporating coagulation and granular activated carbon, significantly reduced freshwater eutrophication. Although normalized endpoint impacts indicated comparable ecosystem impacts for both systems, the LC-MBR resulted in 8% lower impacts on human health and 60% lower on resource depletion. Overall, the findings support decentralized wastewater treatment as a sustainable solution for small communities in arid regions and provide valuable insights for policy and decision-making.

MembranesVol. 16(2)
Qassim University (SA)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.