On the Concordance Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography for Left Heart Function Assessment

CCT can accurately assess LV function when compared with CMR when using voxel-based methods and consistent papillary segmentation approaches. Biplane and measurements with wide slice spacings reduce agreement, warranting standardization for clinical interchangeability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001855
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Concordance Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography for Left Heart Function Assessment

James W. Goldfarb
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

On the Concordance Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography for Left Heart Function Assessment

James W. Goldfarb
article en

Abstract

CCT can accurately assess LV function when compared with CMR when using voxel-based methods and consistent papillary segmentation approaches. Biplane and measurements with wide slice spacings reduce agreement, warranting standardization for clinical interchangeability.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
St. Francis Hospital (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.