Confronting holographic dark energy with the latest cosmological data: tensions and model viability

ABSTRACT Recent results from the second data release (DR2) from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) hint at a possible dynamical form of dark energy. This motivates a fresh look at physically motivated alternatives to the standard Lambda cold dark matter model. In this work, we test two such scenarios – holographic dark energy (HDE) and Ricci dark energy (RDE) – against a wide range of observations. The data sets include cosmic chronometers, gamma-ray bursts, three major Type Ia supernova compilations (Pantheon+SH0ES, DES-Dovekie, and Union3), the new DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and cosmic microwave background (CMB) distance priors from Planck 2018 + ACT-DR6. Our analysis shows that the RDE model is observationally non-viable. While late-time probes suggest a good fit by favouring a low matter density ($\Omega _{m0} \approx 0.19$–0.22), the inclusion of CMB priors forces $\Omega _{m0}$ to standard values, causing a catastrophic internal tension ($\,\gt\,5\sigma$) and decisive statistical rejection. For the HDE model, we identify a clear tension among data sets. Supernova-dominated samples tend to favour a quintessence-like state ($c \,\gt\, 1.2$), while the combination of DESI BAO and CMB data strongly shifts constraints towards a phantom behaviour ($c \approx 0.69$). We confirm that neither model resolves the Hubble tension. A formal model selection analysis shows that while late-time data yield a spurious preference for dynamical models ($\Delta \text{AIC} \,\lt\, 0$), this vanishes completely when early-Universe constraints are applied. We conclude, in agreement with other analyses, that the apparent hints for new physics are likely statistical artefacts of underlying data set tensions, such as the reported $\Omega _m$ tension. The key result is the CMB-driven indication of a phantom regime for HDE, which points towards interacting holographic dark energy as a promising next step to avoid a Big Rip singularity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag365
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confronting holographic dark energy with the latest cosmological data: tensions and model viability

Devaraja Mallesha Naik
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Confronting holographic dark energy with the latest cosmological data: tensions and model viability

Devaraja Mallesha Naik
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent results from the second data release (DR2) from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) hint at a possible dynamical form of dark energy. This motivates a fresh look at physically motivated alternatives to the standard Lambda cold dark matter model. In this work, we test two such scenarios – holographic dark energy (HDE) and Ricci dark energy (RDE) – against a wide range of observations. The data sets include cosmic chronometers, gamma-ray bursts, three major Type Ia supernova compilations (Pantheon+SH0ES, DES-Dovekie, and Union3), the new DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and cosmic microwave background (CMB) distance priors from Planck 2018 + ACT-DR6. Our analysis shows that the RDE model is observationally non-viable. While late-time probes suggest a good fit by favouring a low matter density ($\Omega _{m0} \approx 0.19$–0.22), the inclusion of CMB priors forces $\Omega _{m0}$ to standard values, causing a catastrophic internal tension ($\,\gt\,5\sigma$) and decisive statistical rejection. For the HDE model, we identify a clear tension among data sets. Supernova-dominated samples tend to favour a quintessence-like state ($c \,\gt\, 1.2$), while the combination of DESI BAO and CMB data strongly shifts constraints towards a phantom behaviour ($c \approx 0.69$). We confirm that neither model resolves the Hubble tension. A formal model selection analysis shows that while late-time data yield a spurious preference for dynamical models ($\Delta \text{AIC} \,\lt\, 0$), this vanishes completely when early-Universe constraints are applied. We conclude, in agreement with other analyses, that the apparent hints for new physics are likely statistical artefacts of underlying data set tensions, such as the reported $\Omega _m$ tension. The key result is the CMB-driven indication of a phantom regime for HDE, which points towards interacting holographic dark energy as a promising next step to avoid a Big Rip singularity.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 547(3)
Kuvempu University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.