Coaching as an instructional strategy for special education teachers: Evaluating the rigour and quality of the literature

Abstract Special education teachers receive professional development training that rarely includes the use of coaching. Coaching is essential as it provides teachers with specific strategies and feedback to enhance their skillset. Thus, the aim of this systematic literature review was to identify single‐case research design studies that evaluated coaching of special education teachers. Studies were assessed for rigour and quality using the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF), to identify commonly used coaching components, assess coaching effectiveness through improvement rate difference (IRD) calculations, and identify research gaps. Using a multifaceted search procedure, 14 studies were included. Findings indicated that most studies had low SCARF rigour scores, high SCARF quality and breadth of measurement scores (Q‐BM) and high IRD scores. Common coaching components included an initial presentation, practice of the skill and provision of feedback. Practical implications and future research directions are also reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70072
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coaching as an instructional strategy for special education teachers: Evaluating the rigour and quality of the literature

Miriam C. Boesch, Keren E. Deneny, Hanneh S. Shiheiber, Kaitlyn R. Shaw et al.
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
article

Coaching as an instructional strategy for special education teachers: Evaluating the rigour and quality of the literature

Miriam C. Boesch, Keren E. Deneny, Hanneh S. Shiheiber, Kaitlyn R. Shaw, Margaret F. Davis, M. Alexandra Da Fonte
article en

Abstract

Abstract Special education teachers receive professional development training that rarely includes the use of coaching. Coaching is essential as it provides teachers with specific strategies and feedback to enhance their skillset. Thus, the aim of this systematic literature review was to identify single‐case research design studies that evaluated coaching of special education teachers. Studies were assessed for rigour and quality using the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF), to identify commonly used coaching components, assess coaching effectiveness through improvement rate difference (IRD) calculations, and identify research gaps. Using a multifaceted search procedure, 14 studies were included. Findings indicated that most studies had low SCARF rigour scores, high SCARF quality and breadth of measurement scores (Q‐BM) and high IRD scores. Common coaching components included an initial presentation, practice of the skill and provision of feedback. Practical implications and future research directions are also reported.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 26(2)
University of North Texas (US), Vanderbilt University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.