Comparison of machine learning interpolation models for movement trajectories of desert bighorn sheep

Abstract Global positioning system (GPS) collars have revolutionized wildlife monitoring by enabling fine-scale inference of animal movement, behavior, and habitat use. However, GPS fix failures associated with terrain, canopy, or animal behavior introduce bias into downstream ecological analyses. In a study of 16 translocated desert bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis mexicana ) in Sonora, Mexico, we recorded 55,277 scheduled GPS fixes over 18 months, of which 720 (1.3%) were missing not completely at random with the highest rate of missingness during July (268 missing of 3720 scheduled or 7.20%). To interpolate missing locations, we evaluated five predictive models: linear regression (LM), random forest (RF), treed Gaussian processes (TGP), Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), and generalized additive models (GAM). Models were fit using temporally embedded covariates derived from environmental, temporal, and movement-related features. Random forest models achieved the highest accuracy on average (mean Euclidean distance = 54.6 m) across all individuals, outperforming BART (188.3 m), GAM (190.8 m), LM (190.6 m), and TGP (210.5 m). However, RF models also exhibited higher variability in predictive performance. Our results demonstrate that temporally embedded features capture complex behavioral and environmental dependencies, enabling accurate interpolation of GPS fixes. While RF models offer predictive advantages, post hoc averaging with lower-variance models (e.g., BART) may improve uncertainty quantification. These findings provide a demonstration of estimating a phenomenological interpolation model for subsequent animal movement analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-026-00713-w
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of machine learning interpolation models for movement trajectories of desert bighorn sheep

Toryn L. J. Schafer, Dylan G. Stewart, S.J.S. WEBB, E. Alejandro Lozano-Cavazos et al.
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Comparison of machine learning interpolation models for movement trajectories of desert bighorn sheep

Toryn L. J. Schafer, Dylan G. Stewart, S.J.S. WEBB, E. Alejandro Lozano-Cavazos, John Paul C. Acosta, Seong Won Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract Global positioning system (GPS) collars have revolutionized wildlife monitoring by enabling fine-scale inference of animal movement, behavior, and habitat use. However, GPS fix failures associated with terrain, canopy, or animal behavior introduce bias into downstream ecological analyses. In a study of 16 translocated desert bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis mexicana ) in Sonora, Mexico, we recorded 55,277 scheduled GPS fixes over 18 months, of which 720 (1.3%) were missing not completely at random with the highest rate of missingness during July (268 missing of 3720 scheduled or 7.20%). To interpolate missing locations, we evaluated five predictive models: linear regression (LM), random forest (RF), treed Gaussian processes (TGP), Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), and generalized additive models (GAM). Models were fit using temporally embedded covariates derived from environmental, temporal, and movement-related features. Random forest models achieved the highest accuracy on average (mean Euclidean distance = 54.6 m) across all individuals, outperforming BART (188.3 m), GAM (190.8 m), LM (190.6 m), and TGP (210.5 m). However, RF models also exhibited higher variability in predictive performance. Our results demonstrate that temporally embedded features capture complex behavioral and environmental dependencies, enabling accurate interpolation of GPS fixes. While RF models offer predictive advantages, post hoc averaging with lower-variance models (e.g., BART) may improve uncertainty quantification. These findings provide a demonstration of estimating a phenomenological interpolation model for subsequent animal movement analyses.

Environmental and Ecological StatisticsVol. 33(1)
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro (MX), Texas A&M University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.